Practice parameters for child custody evaluation

S. P. Herman, J. E. Dunne, W. Ayres, Valerie Arnold, E. Benedek, R. S. Benson, W. Bernet, G. A. Bernstein, E. Bryant, O. Bukstein, R. L. Gross, R. King, J. Kinlan, H. Leonard, W. Licamele, J. McClellan, K. Shaw, L. Haller, D. Schesky, L. E. Sloan & 1 others C. M. Miles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

These practice parameters are presented as a guide for clinicians evaluating the often delicate and complex issues surrounding a child custody dispute. The historical basis of child custody and the various judicial presumptions that have guided courts are reviewed. The differences between performing child custody evaluation and engaging in traditional clinical practice are emphasized. Issues that are common to all child custody disputes are presented, including continuity and quality of attachments, preference, parental alienation, special needs of children, education, gender issues, sibling relationships, parents' physical and mental health, parents' work schedules, parents' finances, styles of parenting and discipline, conflict resolution, social support systems, cultural and ethnic issues, ethics and values, and religion. In addition, special issues that complicate custody evaluations are discussed, including infants in custody disputes, homosexual parents, grandparents' rights, parental kidnaping, relocation problems, allegations of sexual abuse, and advances in reproductive technology, such as frozen embryos, oocyte donation, and artificial insemination. An outline is provided that describes the complete evaluation process, from assessing referrals and planning a strategy through conducting clinical interviews, writing the report, and testifying in court.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57S-68S
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Volume36
Issue number10 SUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Child Custody
Dissent and Disputes
Parents
Embryo Disposition
Oocyte Donation
Reproductive Techniques
Artificial Insemination
Sex Offenses
Negotiating
Parenting
Religion
Crime
Interpersonal Relations
Ethics
Social Support
Siblings
Appointments and Schedules
Mental Health
Referral and Consultation
Interviews

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Herman, S. P., Dunne, J. E., Ayres, W., Arnold, V., Benedek, E., Benson, R. S., ... Miles, C. M. (1997). Practice parameters for child custody evaluation. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(10 SUPPL.), 57S-68S. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199710001-00005

Practice parameters for child custody evaluation. / Herman, S. P.; Dunne, J. E.; Ayres, W.; Arnold, Valerie; Benedek, E.; Benson, R. S.; Bernet, W.; Bernstein, G. A.; Bryant, E.; Bukstein, O.; Gross, R. L.; King, R.; Kinlan, J.; Leonard, H.; Licamele, W.; McClellan, J.; Shaw, K.; Haller, L.; Schesky, D.; Sloan, L. E.; Miles, C. M.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vol. 36, No. 10 SUPPL., 01.01.1997, p. 57S-68S.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Herman, SP, Dunne, JE, Ayres, W, Arnold, V, Benedek, E, Benson, RS, Bernet, W, Bernstein, GA, Bryant, E, Bukstein, O, Gross, RL, King, R, Kinlan, J, Leonard, H, Licamele, W, McClellan, J, Shaw, K, Haller, L, Schesky, D, Sloan, LE & Miles, CM 1997, 'Practice parameters for child custody evaluation', Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 36, no. 10 SUPPL., pp. 57S-68S. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199710001-00005
Herman, S. P. ; Dunne, J. E. ; Ayres, W. ; Arnold, Valerie ; Benedek, E. ; Benson, R. S. ; Bernet, W. ; Bernstein, G. A. ; Bryant, E. ; Bukstein, O. ; Gross, R. L. ; King, R. ; Kinlan, J. ; Leonard, H. ; Licamele, W. ; McClellan, J. ; Shaw, K. ; Haller, L. ; Schesky, D. ; Sloan, L. E. ; Miles, C. M. / Practice parameters for child custody evaluation. In: Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 1997 ; Vol. 36, No. 10 SUPPL. pp. 57S-68S.
@article{93f34204091a4c1e994a702244d3725f,
title = "Practice parameters for child custody evaluation",
abstract = "These practice parameters are presented as a guide for clinicians evaluating the often delicate and complex issues surrounding a child custody dispute. The historical basis of child custody and the various judicial presumptions that have guided courts are reviewed. The differences between performing child custody evaluation and engaging in traditional clinical practice are emphasized. Issues that are common to all child custody disputes are presented, including continuity and quality of attachments, preference, parental alienation, special needs of children, education, gender issues, sibling relationships, parents' physical and mental health, parents' work schedules, parents' finances, styles of parenting and discipline, conflict resolution, social support systems, cultural and ethnic issues, ethics and values, and religion. In addition, special issues that complicate custody evaluations are discussed, including infants in custody disputes, homosexual parents, grandparents' rights, parental kidnaping, relocation problems, allegations of sexual abuse, and advances in reproductive technology, such as frozen embryos, oocyte donation, and artificial insemination. An outline is provided that describes the complete evaluation process, from assessing referrals and planning a strategy through conducting clinical interviews, writing the report, and testifying in court.",
author = "Herman, {S. P.} and Dunne, {J. E.} and W. Ayres and Valerie Arnold and E. Benedek and Benson, {R. S.} and W. Bernet and Bernstein, {G. A.} and E. Bryant and O. Bukstein and Gross, {R. L.} and R. King and J. Kinlan and H. Leonard and W. Licamele and J. McClellan and K. Shaw and L. Haller and D. Schesky and Sloan, {L. E.} and Miles, {C. M.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00004583-199710001-00005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "57S--68S",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry",
issn = "0890-8567",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "10 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practice parameters for child custody evaluation

AU - Herman, S. P.

AU - Dunne, J. E.

AU - Ayres, W.

AU - Arnold, Valerie

AU - Benedek, E.

AU - Benson, R. S.

AU - Bernet, W.

AU - Bernstein, G. A.

AU - Bryant, E.

AU - Bukstein, O.

AU - Gross, R. L.

AU - King, R.

AU - Kinlan, J.

AU - Leonard, H.

AU - Licamele, W.

AU - McClellan, J.

AU - Shaw, K.

AU - Haller, L.

AU - Schesky, D.

AU - Sloan, L. E.

AU - Miles, C. M.

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - These practice parameters are presented as a guide for clinicians evaluating the often delicate and complex issues surrounding a child custody dispute. The historical basis of child custody and the various judicial presumptions that have guided courts are reviewed. The differences between performing child custody evaluation and engaging in traditional clinical practice are emphasized. Issues that are common to all child custody disputes are presented, including continuity and quality of attachments, preference, parental alienation, special needs of children, education, gender issues, sibling relationships, parents' physical and mental health, parents' work schedules, parents' finances, styles of parenting and discipline, conflict resolution, social support systems, cultural and ethnic issues, ethics and values, and religion. In addition, special issues that complicate custody evaluations are discussed, including infants in custody disputes, homosexual parents, grandparents' rights, parental kidnaping, relocation problems, allegations of sexual abuse, and advances in reproductive technology, such as frozen embryos, oocyte donation, and artificial insemination. An outline is provided that describes the complete evaluation process, from assessing referrals and planning a strategy through conducting clinical interviews, writing the report, and testifying in court.

AB - These practice parameters are presented as a guide for clinicians evaluating the often delicate and complex issues surrounding a child custody dispute. The historical basis of child custody and the various judicial presumptions that have guided courts are reviewed. The differences between performing child custody evaluation and engaging in traditional clinical practice are emphasized. Issues that are common to all child custody disputes are presented, including continuity and quality of attachments, preference, parental alienation, special needs of children, education, gender issues, sibling relationships, parents' physical and mental health, parents' work schedules, parents' finances, styles of parenting and discipline, conflict resolution, social support systems, cultural and ethnic issues, ethics and values, and religion. In addition, special issues that complicate custody evaluations are discussed, including infants in custody disputes, homosexual parents, grandparents' rights, parental kidnaping, relocation problems, allegations of sexual abuse, and advances in reproductive technology, such as frozen embryos, oocyte donation, and artificial insemination. An outline is provided that describes the complete evaluation process, from assessing referrals and planning a strategy through conducting clinical interviews, writing the report, and testifying in court.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17444434988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17444434988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00004583-199710001-00005

DO - 10.1097/00004583-199710001-00005

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 57S-68S

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

SN - 0890-8567

IS - 10 SUPPL.

ER -