Precision and estimated accuracy of two short term food frequency questionnaires compared with recalls and records

Linda H. Eck, Lisa M. Klesges, Robert Klesges

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two widely used food frequency questionnaires (Block FFQ, Willett FFQ) were modified to reflect intake over the past 7 days and compared to intake information gathered from diet records and 24-hr recalls covering the same 7-day period. The Block FFQ and the Willett FFQ were also gathered at the beginning of the assessment period to reflect the 7 day period of time before records and recalls were gathered. Fifty-six subjects were assigned to either recording diet for 3 days, recording diet for 6 days, or providing three 24- hr recalls. Results indicate similar levels of within-method test-retest reliabilities for 3-day RECORDS and 6 day RECORDS, and within the two Block FFQs and within the two Willett FFQs from each subject, while lower reliabilities were seen in 24-hr RECALLS. When the FFQs were compared to the 6-day RECORDS with between method agreement coefficients, there was a moderate level of agreement, with most values between 0.5 and 0.8 for both FFQs. Significant differences between mean levels of nutrients estimated by the three methods indicated differences only in the estimates of carbohydrate and vitamin A. The use of FFQs to gather short-term intake information is discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1195-1200
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume49
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

Food
Diet
Diet Records
Vitamin A
Reproducibility of Results
Carbohydrates
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Precision and estimated accuracy of two short term food frequency questionnaires compared with recalls and records. / Eck, Linda H.; Klesges, Lisa M.; Klesges, Robert.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 49, No. 10, 01.01.1996, p. 1195-1200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eck, Linda H. ; Klesges, Lisa M. ; Klesges, Robert. / Precision and estimated accuracy of two short term food frequency questionnaires compared with recalls and records. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1996 ; Vol. 49, No. 10. pp. 1195-1200.
@article{e511fb85329243d79ecdce5cf7c42aa9,
title = "Precision and estimated accuracy of two short term food frequency questionnaires compared with recalls and records",
abstract = "Two widely used food frequency questionnaires (Block FFQ, Willett FFQ) were modified to reflect intake over the past 7 days and compared to intake information gathered from diet records and 24-hr recalls covering the same 7-day period. The Block FFQ and the Willett FFQ were also gathered at the beginning of the assessment period to reflect the 7 day period of time before records and recalls were gathered. Fifty-six subjects were assigned to either recording diet for 3 days, recording diet for 6 days, or providing three 24- hr recalls. Results indicate similar levels of within-method test-retest reliabilities for 3-day RECORDS and 6 day RECORDS, and within the two Block FFQs and within the two Willett FFQs from each subject, while lower reliabilities were seen in 24-hr RECALLS. When the FFQs were compared to the 6-day RECORDS with between method agreement coefficients, there was a moderate level of agreement, with most values between 0.5 and 0.8 for both FFQs. Significant differences between mean levels of nutrients estimated by the three methods indicated differences only in the estimates of carbohydrate and vitamin A. The use of FFQs to gather short-term intake information is discussed.",
author = "Eck, {Linda H.} and Klesges, {Lisa M.} and Robert Klesges",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0895-4356(96)00219-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "1195--1200",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Precision and estimated accuracy of two short term food frequency questionnaires compared with recalls and records

AU - Eck, Linda H.

AU - Klesges, Lisa M.

AU - Klesges, Robert

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Two widely used food frequency questionnaires (Block FFQ, Willett FFQ) were modified to reflect intake over the past 7 days and compared to intake information gathered from diet records and 24-hr recalls covering the same 7-day period. The Block FFQ and the Willett FFQ were also gathered at the beginning of the assessment period to reflect the 7 day period of time before records and recalls were gathered. Fifty-six subjects were assigned to either recording diet for 3 days, recording diet for 6 days, or providing three 24- hr recalls. Results indicate similar levels of within-method test-retest reliabilities for 3-day RECORDS and 6 day RECORDS, and within the two Block FFQs and within the two Willett FFQs from each subject, while lower reliabilities were seen in 24-hr RECALLS. When the FFQs were compared to the 6-day RECORDS with between method agreement coefficients, there was a moderate level of agreement, with most values between 0.5 and 0.8 for both FFQs. Significant differences between mean levels of nutrients estimated by the three methods indicated differences only in the estimates of carbohydrate and vitamin A. The use of FFQs to gather short-term intake information is discussed.

AB - Two widely used food frequency questionnaires (Block FFQ, Willett FFQ) were modified to reflect intake over the past 7 days and compared to intake information gathered from diet records and 24-hr recalls covering the same 7-day period. The Block FFQ and the Willett FFQ were also gathered at the beginning of the assessment period to reflect the 7 day period of time before records and recalls were gathered. Fifty-six subjects were assigned to either recording diet for 3 days, recording diet for 6 days, or providing three 24- hr recalls. Results indicate similar levels of within-method test-retest reliabilities for 3-day RECORDS and 6 day RECORDS, and within the two Block FFQs and within the two Willett FFQs from each subject, while lower reliabilities were seen in 24-hr RECALLS. When the FFQs were compared to the 6-day RECORDS with between method agreement coefficients, there was a moderate level of agreement, with most values between 0.5 and 0.8 for both FFQs. Significant differences between mean levels of nutrients estimated by the three methods indicated differences only in the estimates of carbohydrate and vitamin A. The use of FFQs to gather short-term intake information is discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030273713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030273713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00219-3

DO - 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00219-3

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 1195

EP - 1200

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 10

ER -