Psychophysiological Parameters of Migraine and Muscle‐Contraction Headaches

Kenneth L. Lichstein, Suzanne M. Fischer, Terry L. Eakin, Janis I. Amberson, Tulio Bertorini, Peter W. Hoon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

SYNOPSIS Previous headache studies have been unable to verify the presumed presence of headache. Attempting to correct this design fault, the present study assessed four psychophysiological measures (frontalis EMG, temporal BVP, temporal and finger skin temperature) and salient subjective measures in 13 migraineurs, eight muscle‐contraction headache sufferers, and 13 age‐matched normals. All subjects submitted to two 30‐minute sessions of quiet monitoring, and for the headache subjects, one of the sessions was headache active. A bogus, but convincing preliminary ”assessmentldquo; revealed insufficient headache activity in the headache active session, forcing subjects to reschedule that session in the future when a strong headache was present. A parallel manipulation was employed with the normal subjects. A MANOVA failed to discriminate within‐ or between‐group differences on the psychophysiological measures. Self‐reported pain was uncorrelated with the psychophysiological indices. These results cast further doubt on the validity of the psychophysiological measures employed in this study, the same ones routinely endorsed by headache researchers and therapists. We discuss problems of recruitment, compliance, and attrition in basic headache research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-34
Number of pages8
JournalHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Migraine Disorders
Headache
Skin Temperature
Fingers
Compliance
Research Personnel
Pain

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Psychophysiological Parameters of Migraine and Muscle‐Contraction Headaches. / Lichstein, Kenneth L.; Fischer, Suzanne M.; Eakin, Terry L.; Amberson, Janis I.; Bertorini, Tulio; Hoon, Peter W.

In: Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.01.1991, p. 27-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lichstein, Kenneth L. ; Fischer, Suzanne M. ; Eakin, Terry L. ; Amberson, Janis I. ; Bertorini, Tulio ; Hoon, Peter W. / Psychophysiological Parameters of Migraine and Muscle‐Contraction Headaches. In: Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 1991 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 27-34.
@article{1f0b4dbf97de4d9f9ef4db3121dbec3f,
title = "Psychophysiological Parameters of Migraine and Muscle‐Contraction Headaches",
abstract = "SYNOPSIS Previous headache studies have been unable to verify the presumed presence of headache. Attempting to correct this design fault, the present study assessed four psychophysiological measures (frontalis EMG, temporal BVP, temporal and finger skin temperature) and salient subjective measures in 13 migraineurs, eight muscle‐contraction headache sufferers, and 13 age‐matched normals. All subjects submitted to two 30‐minute sessions of quiet monitoring, and for the headache subjects, one of the sessions was headache active. A bogus, but convincing preliminary ”assessmentldquo; revealed insufficient headache activity in the headache active session, forcing subjects to reschedule that session in the future when a strong headache was present. A parallel manipulation was employed with the normal subjects. A MANOVA failed to discriminate within‐ or between‐group differences on the psychophysiological measures. Self‐reported pain was uncorrelated with the psychophysiological indices. These results cast further doubt on the validity of the psychophysiological measures employed in this study, the same ones routinely endorsed by headache researchers and therapists. We discuss problems of recruitment, compliance, and attrition in basic headache research.",
author = "Lichstein, {Kenneth L.} and Fischer, {Suzanne M.} and Eakin, {Terry L.} and Amberson, {Janis I.} and Tulio Bertorini and Hoon, {Peter W.}",
year = "1991",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1526-4610.1991.hed3101027.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "27--34",
journal = "Headache",
issn = "0017-8748",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychophysiological Parameters of Migraine and Muscle‐Contraction Headaches

AU - Lichstein, Kenneth L.

AU - Fischer, Suzanne M.

AU - Eakin, Terry L.

AU - Amberson, Janis I.

AU - Bertorini, Tulio

AU - Hoon, Peter W.

PY - 1991/1/1

Y1 - 1991/1/1

N2 - SYNOPSIS Previous headache studies have been unable to verify the presumed presence of headache. Attempting to correct this design fault, the present study assessed four psychophysiological measures (frontalis EMG, temporal BVP, temporal and finger skin temperature) and salient subjective measures in 13 migraineurs, eight muscle‐contraction headache sufferers, and 13 age‐matched normals. All subjects submitted to two 30‐minute sessions of quiet monitoring, and for the headache subjects, one of the sessions was headache active. A bogus, but convincing preliminary ”assessmentldquo; revealed insufficient headache activity in the headache active session, forcing subjects to reschedule that session in the future when a strong headache was present. A parallel manipulation was employed with the normal subjects. A MANOVA failed to discriminate within‐ or between‐group differences on the psychophysiological measures. Self‐reported pain was uncorrelated with the psychophysiological indices. These results cast further doubt on the validity of the psychophysiological measures employed in this study, the same ones routinely endorsed by headache researchers and therapists. We discuss problems of recruitment, compliance, and attrition in basic headache research.

AB - SYNOPSIS Previous headache studies have been unable to verify the presumed presence of headache. Attempting to correct this design fault, the present study assessed four psychophysiological measures (frontalis EMG, temporal BVP, temporal and finger skin temperature) and salient subjective measures in 13 migraineurs, eight muscle‐contraction headache sufferers, and 13 age‐matched normals. All subjects submitted to two 30‐minute sessions of quiet monitoring, and for the headache subjects, one of the sessions was headache active. A bogus, but convincing preliminary ”assessmentldquo; revealed insufficient headache activity in the headache active session, forcing subjects to reschedule that session in the future when a strong headache was present. A parallel manipulation was employed with the normal subjects. A MANOVA failed to discriminate within‐ or between‐group differences on the psychophysiological measures. Self‐reported pain was uncorrelated with the psychophysiological indices. These results cast further doubt on the validity of the psychophysiological measures employed in this study, the same ones routinely endorsed by headache researchers and therapists. We discuss problems of recruitment, compliance, and attrition in basic headache research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026065124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026065124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1991.hed3101027.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1991.hed3101027.x

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 27

EP - 34

JO - Headache

JF - Headache

SN - 0017-8748

IS - 1

ER -