Radical prostatectomy

Transrectal sonographic evaluation to assess for local recurrence

Caryl G. Salomon, Michael E. Flisak, Mary C. Olson, Christine M. Dudiak, Robert C. Flanigan, W Waters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine sonographic features associated with locally recurrent or residual tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) studies were performed in 21 patients with suspected recurrent prostatic carcinoma after prostatectomy. The original prospective TRUS reports were reviewed, followed by blinded review, and the findings were compared with biopsy results. RESULTS: A discrete perianastomotic mass was identified prospectively in eight (73%) of 11 patients with positive biopsy results and in two (17%) of 12 with negative results; no mass was identified in the remaining patients. At preliminary retrospective review, the echogenic retroanastomotic fat plane was not intact in 10 (91%) of 11 patients with positive biopsy results and in two (17%) of 12 with negative results; it was intact in the remaining patients. CONCLUSION: Sonographic visualization of a mass in the prostate bed or loss of integrity of the retroanastomotic fat plane is strongly correlated with finding recurrent or residual tumor in this location. TRUS in evaluation of the source of postoperative elevation of prostate-specific antigen levels warrants further investigation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)713-719
Number of pages7
JournalRadiology
Volume189
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Recurrence
Residual Neoplasm
Biopsy
Fats
Prostate-Specific Antigen
Prostate
Carcinoma

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Radical prostatectomy : Transrectal sonographic evaluation to assess for local recurrence. / Salomon, Caryl G.; Flisak, Michael E.; Olson, Mary C.; Dudiak, Christine M.; Flanigan, Robert C.; Waters, W.

In: Radiology, Vol. 189, No. 3, 01.01.1993, p. 713-719.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Salomon, Caryl G. ; Flisak, Michael E. ; Olson, Mary C. ; Dudiak, Christine M. ; Flanigan, Robert C. ; Waters, W. / Radical prostatectomy : Transrectal sonographic evaluation to assess for local recurrence. In: Radiology. 1993 ; Vol. 189, No. 3. pp. 713-719.
@article{8ff07281f9984c15aedc3245deb6f5bd,
title = "Radical prostatectomy: Transrectal sonographic evaluation to assess for local recurrence",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To determine sonographic features associated with locally recurrent or residual tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) studies were performed in 21 patients with suspected recurrent prostatic carcinoma after prostatectomy. The original prospective TRUS reports were reviewed, followed by blinded review, and the findings were compared with biopsy results. RESULTS: A discrete perianastomotic mass was identified prospectively in eight (73{\%}) of 11 patients with positive biopsy results and in two (17{\%}) of 12 with negative results; no mass was identified in the remaining patients. At preliminary retrospective review, the echogenic retroanastomotic fat plane was not intact in 10 (91{\%}) of 11 patients with positive biopsy results and in two (17{\%}) of 12 with negative results; it was intact in the remaining patients. CONCLUSION: Sonographic visualization of a mass in the prostate bed or loss of integrity of the retroanastomotic fat plane is strongly correlated with finding recurrent or residual tumor in this location. TRUS in evaluation of the source of postoperative elevation of prostate-specific antigen levels warrants further investigation.",
author = "Salomon, {Caryl G.} and Flisak, {Michael E.} and Olson, {Mary C.} and Dudiak, {Christine M.} and Flanigan, {Robert C.} and W Waters",
year = "1993",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1148/radiology.189.3.7694311",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "189",
pages = "713--719",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radical prostatectomy

T2 - Transrectal sonographic evaluation to assess for local recurrence

AU - Salomon, Caryl G.

AU - Flisak, Michael E.

AU - Olson, Mary C.

AU - Dudiak, Christine M.

AU - Flanigan, Robert C.

AU - Waters, W

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To determine sonographic features associated with locally recurrent or residual tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) studies were performed in 21 patients with suspected recurrent prostatic carcinoma after prostatectomy. The original prospective TRUS reports were reviewed, followed by blinded review, and the findings were compared with biopsy results. RESULTS: A discrete perianastomotic mass was identified prospectively in eight (73%) of 11 patients with positive biopsy results and in two (17%) of 12 with negative results; no mass was identified in the remaining patients. At preliminary retrospective review, the echogenic retroanastomotic fat plane was not intact in 10 (91%) of 11 patients with positive biopsy results and in two (17%) of 12 with negative results; it was intact in the remaining patients. CONCLUSION: Sonographic visualization of a mass in the prostate bed or loss of integrity of the retroanastomotic fat plane is strongly correlated with finding recurrent or residual tumor in this location. TRUS in evaluation of the source of postoperative elevation of prostate-specific antigen levels warrants further investigation.

AB - PURPOSE: To determine sonographic features associated with locally recurrent or residual tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) studies were performed in 21 patients with suspected recurrent prostatic carcinoma after prostatectomy. The original prospective TRUS reports were reviewed, followed by blinded review, and the findings were compared with biopsy results. RESULTS: A discrete perianastomotic mass was identified prospectively in eight (73%) of 11 patients with positive biopsy results and in two (17%) of 12 with negative results; no mass was identified in the remaining patients. At preliminary retrospective review, the echogenic retroanastomotic fat plane was not intact in 10 (91%) of 11 patients with positive biopsy results and in two (17%) of 12 with negative results; it was intact in the remaining patients. CONCLUSION: Sonographic visualization of a mass in the prostate bed or loss of integrity of the retroanastomotic fat plane is strongly correlated with finding recurrent or residual tumor in this location. TRUS in evaluation of the source of postoperative elevation of prostate-specific antigen levels warrants further investigation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027435074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027435074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiology.189.3.7694311

DO - 10.1148/radiology.189.3.7694311

M3 - Article

VL - 189

SP - 713

EP - 719

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 3

ER -