Regional replication of association with refractive error on 15q14 and 15q25 in the age-related eye disease study cohort

Claire Simpson, Robert Wojciechowski, Stephanie S. Yee, Poorva Soni, Joan E. Bailey-Wilson, Dwight Stambolian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Refractive error is a complex trait with multiple genetic and environmental risk factors, and is the most common cause of preventable blindness worldwide. The common nature of the trait suggests the presence of many genetic factors that individually may have modest effects. To achieve an adequate sample size to detect these common variants, large, international collaborations have formed. These consortia typically use meta-analysis to combine multiple studies from many different populations. This approach is robust to differences between populations; however, it does not compensate for the different haplotypes in each genetic background evidenced by different alleles in linkage disequilibrium with the causative variant. We used the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) cohort to replicate published significant associations at two loci on chromosome 15 from two genome-wide association studies (GWASs). The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that exhibited association on chromosome 15 in the original studies did not show evidence of association with refractive error in the AREDS cohort. This paper seeks to determine whether the non-replication in this AREDS sample may be due to the limited number of SNPs chosen for replication. Methods: We selected all SNPs genotyped on the Illumina Omni2.5v1_B array or custom TaqMan assays or imputed from the GWAS data, in the region surrounding the SNPs from the Consortium for Refractive Error and Myopia study. We analyzed the SNPs for association with refractive error using standard regression methods in PLINK. The effective number of tests was calculated using the Genetic Type I Error Calculator. Results: Although use of the same SNPs used in the Consortium for Refractive Error and Myopia study did not show any evidence of association with refractive error in this AREDS sample, other SNPs within the candidate regions demonstrated an association with refractive error. Significant evidence of association was found using the hyperopia categorical trait, with the most significant SNPs rs1357179 on 15q14 (p=1.69×10 -3 ) and rs7164400 on 15q25 (p=8.39×10 -4 ), which passed the replication thresholds. Conclusions: This study adds to the growing body of evidence that attempting to replicate the most significant SNPs found in one population may not be significant in another population due to differences in the linkage disequilibrium structure and/or allele frequency. This suggests that replication studies should include less significant SNPs in an associated region rather than only a few selected SNPs chosen by a significance threshold.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2173-2186
Number of pages14
JournalMolecular Vision
Volume19
StatePublished - Nov 2 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Refractive Errors
Eye Diseases
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
Cohort Studies
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15
Genome-Wide Association Study
Myopia
Linkage Disequilibrium
Population
Hyperopia
Blindness
Gene Frequency
Sample Size
Haplotypes
Meta-Analysis
Alleles

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Simpson, C., Wojciechowski, R., Yee, S. S., Soni, P., Bailey-Wilson, J. E., & Stambolian, D. (2013). Regional replication of association with refractive error on 15q14 and 15q25 in the age-related eye disease study cohort. Molecular Vision, 19, 2173-2186.

Regional replication of association with refractive error on 15q14 and 15q25 in the age-related eye disease study cohort. / Simpson, Claire; Wojciechowski, Robert; Yee, Stephanie S.; Soni, Poorva; Bailey-Wilson, Joan E.; Stambolian, Dwight.

In: Molecular Vision, Vol. 19, 02.11.2013, p. 2173-2186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Simpson, C, Wojciechowski, R, Yee, SS, Soni, P, Bailey-Wilson, JE & Stambolian, D 2013, 'Regional replication of association with refractive error on 15q14 and 15q25 in the age-related eye disease study cohort', Molecular Vision, vol. 19, pp. 2173-2186.
Simpson, Claire ; Wojciechowski, Robert ; Yee, Stephanie S. ; Soni, Poorva ; Bailey-Wilson, Joan E. ; Stambolian, Dwight. / Regional replication of association with refractive error on 15q14 and 15q25 in the age-related eye disease study cohort. In: Molecular Vision. 2013 ; Vol. 19. pp. 2173-2186.
@article{929df6d403014fbe822ebc16ad0589aa,
title = "Regional replication of association with refractive error on 15q14 and 15q25 in the age-related eye disease study cohort",
abstract = "Purpose: Refractive error is a complex trait with multiple genetic and environmental risk factors, and is the most common cause of preventable blindness worldwide. The common nature of the trait suggests the presence of many genetic factors that individually may have modest effects. To achieve an adequate sample size to detect these common variants, large, international collaborations have formed. These consortia typically use meta-analysis to combine multiple studies from many different populations. This approach is robust to differences between populations; however, it does not compensate for the different haplotypes in each genetic background evidenced by different alleles in linkage disequilibrium with the causative variant. We used the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) cohort to replicate published significant associations at two loci on chromosome 15 from two genome-wide association studies (GWASs). The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that exhibited association on chromosome 15 in the original studies did not show evidence of association with refractive error in the AREDS cohort. This paper seeks to determine whether the non-replication in this AREDS sample may be due to the limited number of SNPs chosen for replication. Methods: We selected all SNPs genotyped on the Illumina Omni2.5v1_B array or custom TaqMan assays or imputed from the GWAS data, in the region surrounding the SNPs from the Consortium for Refractive Error and Myopia study. We analyzed the SNPs for association with refractive error using standard regression methods in PLINK. The effective number of tests was calculated using the Genetic Type I Error Calculator. Results: Although use of the same SNPs used in the Consortium for Refractive Error and Myopia study did not show any evidence of association with refractive error in this AREDS sample, other SNPs within the candidate regions demonstrated an association with refractive error. Significant evidence of association was found using the hyperopia categorical trait, with the most significant SNPs rs1357179 on 15q14 (p=1.69×10 -3 ) and rs7164400 on 15q25 (p=8.39×10 -4 ), which passed the replication thresholds. Conclusions: This study adds to the growing body of evidence that attempting to replicate the most significant SNPs found in one population may not be significant in another population due to differences in the linkage disequilibrium structure and/or allele frequency. This suggests that replication studies should include less significant SNPs in an associated region rather than only a few selected SNPs chosen by a significance threshold.",
author = "Claire Simpson and Robert Wojciechowski and Yee, {Stephanie S.} and Poorva Soni and Bailey-Wilson, {Joan E.} and Dwight Stambolian",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "2173--2186",
journal = "Molecular Vision",
issn = "1090-0535",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regional replication of association with refractive error on 15q14 and 15q25 in the age-related eye disease study cohort

AU - Simpson, Claire

AU - Wojciechowski, Robert

AU - Yee, Stephanie S.

AU - Soni, Poorva

AU - Bailey-Wilson, Joan E.

AU - Stambolian, Dwight

PY - 2013/11/2

Y1 - 2013/11/2

N2 - Purpose: Refractive error is a complex trait with multiple genetic and environmental risk factors, and is the most common cause of preventable blindness worldwide. The common nature of the trait suggests the presence of many genetic factors that individually may have modest effects. To achieve an adequate sample size to detect these common variants, large, international collaborations have formed. These consortia typically use meta-analysis to combine multiple studies from many different populations. This approach is robust to differences between populations; however, it does not compensate for the different haplotypes in each genetic background evidenced by different alleles in linkage disequilibrium with the causative variant. We used the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) cohort to replicate published significant associations at two loci on chromosome 15 from two genome-wide association studies (GWASs). The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that exhibited association on chromosome 15 in the original studies did not show evidence of association with refractive error in the AREDS cohort. This paper seeks to determine whether the non-replication in this AREDS sample may be due to the limited number of SNPs chosen for replication. Methods: We selected all SNPs genotyped on the Illumina Omni2.5v1_B array or custom TaqMan assays or imputed from the GWAS data, in the region surrounding the SNPs from the Consortium for Refractive Error and Myopia study. We analyzed the SNPs for association with refractive error using standard regression methods in PLINK. The effective number of tests was calculated using the Genetic Type I Error Calculator. Results: Although use of the same SNPs used in the Consortium for Refractive Error and Myopia study did not show any evidence of association with refractive error in this AREDS sample, other SNPs within the candidate regions demonstrated an association with refractive error. Significant evidence of association was found using the hyperopia categorical trait, with the most significant SNPs rs1357179 on 15q14 (p=1.69×10 -3 ) and rs7164400 on 15q25 (p=8.39×10 -4 ), which passed the replication thresholds. Conclusions: This study adds to the growing body of evidence that attempting to replicate the most significant SNPs found in one population may not be significant in another population due to differences in the linkage disequilibrium structure and/or allele frequency. This suggests that replication studies should include less significant SNPs in an associated region rather than only a few selected SNPs chosen by a significance threshold.

AB - Purpose: Refractive error is a complex trait with multiple genetic and environmental risk factors, and is the most common cause of preventable blindness worldwide. The common nature of the trait suggests the presence of many genetic factors that individually may have modest effects. To achieve an adequate sample size to detect these common variants, large, international collaborations have formed. These consortia typically use meta-analysis to combine multiple studies from many different populations. This approach is robust to differences between populations; however, it does not compensate for the different haplotypes in each genetic background evidenced by different alleles in linkage disequilibrium with the causative variant. We used the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) cohort to replicate published significant associations at two loci on chromosome 15 from two genome-wide association studies (GWASs). The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that exhibited association on chromosome 15 in the original studies did not show evidence of association with refractive error in the AREDS cohort. This paper seeks to determine whether the non-replication in this AREDS sample may be due to the limited number of SNPs chosen for replication. Methods: We selected all SNPs genotyped on the Illumina Omni2.5v1_B array or custom TaqMan assays or imputed from the GWAS data, in the region surrounding the SNPs from the Consortium for Refractive Error and Myopia study. We analyzed the SNPs for association with refractive error using standard regression methods in PLINK. The effective number of tests was calculated using the Genetic Type I Error Calculator. Results: Although use of the same SNPs used in the Consortium for Refractive Error and Myopia study did not show any evidence of association with refractive error in this AREDS sample, other SNPs within the candidate regions demonstrated an association with refractive error. Significant evidence of association was found using the hyperopia categorical trait, with the most significant SNPs rs1357179 on 15q14 (p=1.69×10 -3 ) and rs7164400 on 15q25 (p=8.39×10 -4 ), which passed the replication thresholds. Conclusions: This study adds to the growing body of evidence that attempting to replicate the most significant SNPs found in one population may not be significant in another population due to differences in the linkage disequilibrium structure and/or allele frequency. This suggests that replication studies should include less significant SNPs in an associated region rather than only a few selected SNPs chosen by a significance threshold.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887160991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887160991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 2173

EP - 2186

JO - Molecular Vision

JF - Molecular Vision

SN - 1090-0535

ER -