Reliability and validity of cardiovascular and vasomotor autonomic function tests

Mary S. Hartwig, Sergio S. Cardoso, Donna Hathaway, A. Osama Gaber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE - To determine the reliability and validity of autonomic function tests (AFTs) as clinical tools for diagnosing diabetic autonomic dysfunction. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Twenty-one healthy control subjects and 21 insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients (11 with no symptomatology and 10 with symptomatic diabetic autonomic neuropathy [DAN]) were matched for age, and administered three standard cardiovascular tests and two new vasomotor tests of autonomic function. Each of the cardiovascular tests (change in heart rate [Δbpm], Valsalva ratio [VR], change in systolic blood pressure [ΔsBP]) and vasomotor tests (total pulse amplitude [TPA] and percent vasoconstriction [%VC]) were repeated within 1 week. Infrared photoplethysmography measured sympathetic-mediated vasomotor function. Reliability was determined by intraclass correlation coefficients. Validity was determined by analysis of variance procedures to test for differences between known groups and by computing sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. RESULTS - All AFTs were reliable, with %VC having highest reproducibility (r = 0.90). AFT scores were not different from time 1 to time 2. After controlling for age, two cardiovascular tests had significantly different values for control subjects and asymptomatic diabetic patients. AFTs, except ΔsBP, were significantly different between symptomatic diabetic patients and asymptomatic diabetic patients after controlling for age and duration of disease simultaneously. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for %VC were comparable to the values for Δbpm and VR. TPA indexes were lower but clinically acceptable. CONCLUSIONS - AFTs were found to be reliable and valid tests for detecting DAN. TPA and %VC are important because they measure an aspect of sympathetic function not assessed by standard cardiovascular AFTs, and they do not depend on the patient's cooperation or ability to exert effort.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1433-1440
Number of pages8
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume17
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Blood Pressure
Pulse
Diabetic Neuropathies
Photoplethysmography
Sensitivity and Specificity
Aptitude
Patient Compliance
Vasoconstriction
Analysis of Variance
Healthy Volunteers
Research Design
Heart Rate

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

Reliability and validity of cardiovascular and vasomotor autonomic function tests. / Hartwig, Mary S.; Cardoso, Sergio S.; Hathaway, Donna; Gaber, A. Osama.

In: Diabetes Care, Vol. 17, No. 12, 01.01.1994, p. 1433-1440.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hartwig, Mary S. ; Cardoso, Sergio S. ; Hathaway, Donna ; Gaber, A. Osama. / Reliability and validity of cardiovascular and vasomotor autonomic function tests. In: Diabetes Care. 1994 ; Vol. 17, No. 12. pp. 1433-1440.
@article{06c721b7f1eb424298e940cc7391115a,
title = "Reliability and validity of cardiovascular and vasomotor autonomic function tests",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE - To determine the reliability and validity of autonomic function tests (AFTs) as clinical tools for diagnosing diabetic autonomic dysfunction. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Twenty-one healthy control subjects and 21 insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients (11 with no symptomatology and 10 with symptomatic diabetic autonomic neuropathy [DAN]) were matched for age, and administered three standard cardiovascular tests and two new vasomotor tests of autonomic function. Each of the cardiovascular tests (change in heart rate [Δbpm], Valsalva ratio [VR], change in systolic blood pressure [ΔsBP]) and vasomotor tests (total pulse amplitude [TPA] and percent vasoconstriction [{\%}VC]) were repeated within 1 week. Infrared photoplethysmography measured sympathetic-mediated vasomotor function. Reliability was determined by intraclass correlation coefficients. Validity was determined by analysis of variance procedures to test for differences between known groups and by computing sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. RESULTS - All AFTs were reliable, with {\%}VC having highest reproducibility (r = 0.90). AFT scores were not different from time 1 to time 2. After controlling for age, two cardiovascular tests had significantly different values for control subjects and asymptomatic diabetic patients. AFTs, except ΔsBP, were significantly different between symptomatic diabetic patients and asymptomatic diabetic patients after controlling for age and duration of disease simultaneously. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for {\%}VC were comparable to the values for Δbpm and VR. TPA indexes were lower but clinically acceptable. CONCLUSIONS - AFTs were found to be reliable and valid tests for detecting DAN. TPA and {\%}VC are important because they measure an aspect of sympathetic function not assessed by standard cardiovascular AFTs, and they do not depend on the patient's cooperation or ability to exert effort.",
author = "Hartwig, {Mary S.} and Cardoso, {Sergio S.} and Donna Hathaway and Gaber, {A. Osama}",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2337/diacare.17.12.1433",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "1433--1440",
journal = "Diabetes Care",
issn = "1935-5548",
publisher = "American Diabetes Association Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and validity of cardiovascular and vasomotor autonomic function tests

AU - Hartwig, Mary S.

AU - Cardoso, Sergio S.

AU - Hathaway, Donna

AU - Gaber, A. Osama

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE - To determine the reliability and validity of autonomic function tests (AFTs) as clinical tools for diagnosing diabetic autonomic dysfunction. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Twenty-one healthy control subjects and 21 insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients (11 with no symptomatology and 10 with symptomatic diabetic autonomic neuropathy [DAN]) were matched for age, and administered three standard cardiovascular tests and two new vasomotor tests of autonomic function. Each of the cardiovascular tests (change in heart rate [Δbpm], Valsalva ratio [VR], change in systolic blood pressure [ΔsBP]) and vasomotor tests (total pulse amplitude [TPA] and percent vasoconstriction [%VC]) were repeated within 1 week. Infrared photoplethysmography measured sympathetic-mediated vasomotor function. Reliability was determined by intraclass correlation coefficients. Validity was determined by analysis of variance procedures to test for differences between known groups and by computing sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. RESULTS - All AFTs were reliable, with %VC having highest reproducibility (r = 0.90). AFT scores were not different from time 1 to time 2. After controlling for age, two cardiovascular tests had significantly different values for control subjects and asymptomatic diabetic patients. AFTs, except ΔsBP, were significantly different between symptomatic diabetic patients and asymptomatic diabetic patients after controlling for age and duration of disease simultaneously. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for %VC were comparable to the values for Δbpm and VR. TPA indexes were lower but clinically acceptable. CONCLUSIONS - AFTs were found to be reliable and valid tests for detecting DAN. TPA and %VC are important because they measure an aspect of sympathetic function not assessed by standard cardiovascular AFTs, and they do not depend on the patient's cooperation or ability to exert effort.

AB - OBJECTIVE - To determine the reliability and validity of autonomic function tests (AFTs) as clinical tools for diagnosing diabetic autonomic dysfunction. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Twenty-one healthy control subjects and 21 insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients (11 with no symptomatology and 10 with symptomatic diabetic autonomic neuropathy [DAN]) were matched for age, and administered three standard cardiovascular tests and two new vasomotor tests of autonomic function. Each of the cardiovascular tests (change in heart rate [Δbpm], Valsalva ratio [VR], change in systolic blood pressure [ΔsBP]) and vasomotor tests (total pulse amplitude [TPA] and percent vasoconstriction [%VC]) were repeated within 1 week. Infrared photoplethysmography measured sympathetic-mediated vasomotor function. Reliability was determined by intraclass correlation coefficients. Validity was determined by analysis of variance procedures to test for differences between known groups and by computing sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. RESULTS - All AFTs were reliable, with %VC having highest reproducibility (r = 0.90). AFT scores were not different from time 1 to time 2. After controlling for age, two cardiovascular tests had significantly different values for control subjects and asymptomatic diabetic patients. AFTs, except ΔsBP, were significantly different between symptomatic diabetic patients and asymptomatic diabetic patients after controlling for age and duration of disease simultaneously. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for %VC were comparable to the values for Δbpm and VR. TPA indexes were lower but clinically acceptable. CONCLUSIONS - AFTs were found to be reliable and valid tests for detecting DAN. TPA and %VC are important because they measure an aspect of sympathetic function not assessed by standard cardiovascular AFTs, and they do not depend on the patient's cooperation or ability to exert effort.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028091847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028091847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2337/diacare.17.12.1433

DO - 10.2337/diacare.17.12.1433

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 1433

EP - 1440

JO - Diabetes Care

JF - Diabetes Care

SN - 1935-5548

IS - 12

ER -