Repeatability characteristics of simple indices of insulin resistance: Implications for research applications

Kieren J. Mather, A. Evay Hunt, Helmut O. Steinberg, Giancarlo Paradisi, Ginger Hook, Arie Katz, Michael J. Quon, Alain D. Baron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

287 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate test characteristics, such as normality of distribution, variation, and repeatability, of simple fasting measures of insulin sensitivity and to use the results to choose among these measures. Duplicate fasting samples of insulin and glucose were collected before 4 h of euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamping using insulin infusion rates ranging from 40-600 mU/m2·min. Currently recommended estimates of insulin sensitivity, including the fasting insulin, 40/insulin, the homeostasis model assessment, the logarithmic transformation of the homeostasis model assessment, and the Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index, were evaluated. The normality of distribution and the variability of the tests (coefficient of variation and discriminant ratio) were compared between the measures and against the "gold standard" hyperinsulinemic clamp. Data from 253 clamp studies in 152 subjects were examined, including 79 repeated studies for repeatability analysis. In subjects ranging from lean to diabetic, the log transformed fasting measures combining insulin and glucose had normal distributions and test characteristics superior to the other simple indices (logarithmic transformation of the homeostasis model assessment coefficient of variation, 0.55; discriminant ratio, 13; Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index coefficient of variation, 0.05; discriminant ratio, 10) and statistically comparable to euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamps (coefficient of variation, 0.10; discriminant ratio, 6.4). These favorable characteristics helped explain the superior correlations of these measures with the hyperinsulinemic clamps among insulin-resistant subjects. Furthermore, therapeutic changes in insulin sensitivity were as readily demonstrated with these simple measures as with the hyperinsulinemic clamp. The test characteristics of the logarithmic transformation of the homeostasis model assessment and the Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index are superior to other simple indices of insulin sensitivity. This helps explain their excellent correlations with formal measures both at baseline and with changes in insulin sensitivity and supports their broader application in clinical research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5457-5464
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
Volume86
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Insulin Resistance
Insulin
Research
Fasting
Homeostasis
Clamping devices
Glucose Clamp Technique
Glucose
Normal Distribution
Normal distribution

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Biochemistry
  • Endocrinology
  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Biochemistry, medical

Cite this

Repeatability characteristics of simple indices of insulin resistance : Implications for research applications. / Mather, Kieren J.; Hunt, A. Evay; Steinberg, Helmut O.; Paradisi, Giancarlo; Hook, Ginger; Katz, Arie; Quon, Michael J.; Baron, Alain D.

In: Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, Vol. 86, No. 11, 01.01.2001, p. 5457-5464.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mather, Kieren J. ; Hunt, A. Evay ; Steinberg, Helmut O. ; Paradisi, Giancarlo ; Hook, Ginger ; Katz, Arie ; Quon, Michael J. ; Baron, Alain D. / Repeatability characteristics of simple indices of insulin resistance : Implications for research applications. In: Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2001 ; Vol. 86, No. 11. pp. 5457-5464.
@article{237c556f97a246dfadcd60045d2b7fbf,
title = "Repeatability characteristics of simple indices of insulin resistance: Implications for research applications",
abstract = "The objectives of this study were to evaluate test characteristics, such as normality of distribution, variation, and repeatability, of simple fasting measures of insulin sensitivity and to use the results to choose among these measures. Duplicate fasting samples of insulin and glucose were collected before 4 h of euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamping using insulin infusion rates ranging from 40-600 mU/m2·min. Currently recommended estimates of insulin sensitivity, including the fasting insulin, 40/insulin, the homeostasis model assessment, the logarithmic transformation of the homeostasis model assessment, and the Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index, were evaluated. The normality of distribution and the variability of the tests (coefficient of variation and discriminant ratio) were compared between the measures and against the {"}gold standard{"} hyperinsulinemic clamp. Data from 253 clamp studies in 152 subjects were examined, including 79 repeated studies for repeatability analysis. In subjects ranging from lean to diabetic, the log transformed fasting measures combining insulin and glucose had normal distributions and test characteristics superior to the other simple indices (logarithmic transformation of the homeostasis model assessment coefficient of variation, 0.55; discriminant ratio, 13; Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index coefficient of variation, 0.05; discriminant ratio, 10) and statistically comparable to euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamps (coefficient of variation, 0.10; discriminant ratio, 6.4). These favorable characteristics helped explain the superior correlations of these measures with the hyperinsulinemic clamps among insulin-resistant subjects. Furthermore, therapeutic changes in insulin sensitivity were as readily demonstrated with these simple measures as with the hyperinsulinemic clamp. The test characteristics of the logarithmic transformation of the homeostasis model assessment and the Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index are superior to other simple indices of insulin sensitivity. This helps explain their excellent correlations with formal measures both at baseline and with changes in insulin sensitivity and supports their broader application in clinical research.",
author = "Mather, {Kieren J.} and Hunt, {A. Evay} and Steinberg, {Helmut O.} and Giancarlo Paradisi and Ginger Hook and Arie Katz and Quon, {Michael J.} and Baron, {Alain D.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1210/jcem.86.11.7880",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "5457--5464",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism",
issn = "0021-972X",
publisher = "The Endocrine Society",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repeatability characteristics of simple indices of insulin resistance

T2 - Implications for research applications

AU - Mather, Kieren J.

AU - Hunt, A. Evay

AU - Steinberg, Helmut O.

AU - Paradisi, Giancarlo

AU - Hook, Ginger

AU - Katz, Arie

AU - Quon, Michael J.

AU - Baron, Alain D.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - The objectives of this study were to evaluate test characteristics, such as normality of distribution, variation, and repeatability, of simple fasting measures of insulin sensitivity and to use the results to choose among these measures. Duplicate fasting samples of insulin and glucose were collected before 4 h of euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamping using insulin infusion rates ranging from 40-600 mU/m2·min. Currently recommended estimates of insulin sensitivity, including the fasting insulin, 40/insulin, the homeostasis model assessment, the logarithmic transformation of the homeostasis model assessment, and the Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index, were evaluated. The normality of distribution and the variability of the tests (coefficient of variation and discriminant ratio) were compared between the measures and against the "gold standard" hyperinsulinemic clamp. Data from 253 clamp studies in 152 subjects were examined, including 79 repeated studies for repeatability analysis. In subjects ranging from lean to diabetic, the log transformed fasting measures combining insulin and glucose had normal distributions and test characteristics superior to the other simple indices (logarithmic transformation of the homeostasis model assessment coefficient of variation, 0.55; discriminant ratio, 13; Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index coefficient of variation, 0.05; discriminant ratio, 10) and statistically comparable to euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamps (coefficient of variation, 0.10; discriminant ratio, 6.4). These favorable characteristics helped explain the superior correlations of these measures with the hyperinsulinemic clamps among insulin-resistant subjects. Furthermore, therapeutic changes in insulin sensitivity were as readily demonstrated with these simple measures as with the hyperinsulinemic clamp. The test characteristics of the logarithmic transformation of the homeostasis model assessment and the Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index are superior to other simple indices of insulin sensitivity. This helps explain their excellent correlations with formal measures both at baseline and with changes in insulin sensitivity and supports their broader application in clinical research.

AB - The objectives of this study were to evaluate test characteristics, such as normality of distribution, variation, and repeatability, of simple fasting measures of insulin sensitivity and to use the results to choose among these measures. Duplicate fasting samples of insulin and glucose were collected before 4 h of euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamping using insulin infusion rates ranging from 40-600 mU/m2·min. Currently recommended estimates of insulin sensitivity, including the fasting insulin, 40/insulin, the homeostasis model assessment, the logarithmic transformation of the homeostasis model assessment, and the Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index, were evaluated. The normality of distribution and the variability of the tests (coefficient of variation and discriminant ratio) were compared between the measures and against the "gold standard" hyperinsulinemic clamp. Data from 253 clamp studies in 152 subjects were examined, including 79 repeated studies for repeatability analysis. In subjects ranging from lean to diabetic, the log transformed fasting measures combining insulin and glucose had normal distributions and test characteristics superior to the other simple indices (logarithmic transformation of the homeostasis model assessment coefficient of variation, 0.55; discriminant ratio, 13; Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index coefficient of variation, 0.05; discriminant ratio, 10) and statistically comparable to euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamps (coefficient of variation, 0.10; discriminant ratio, 6.4). These favorable characteristics helped explain the superior correlations of these measures with the hyperinsulinemic clamps among insulin-resistant subjects. Furthermore, therapeutic changes in insulin sensitivity were as readily demonstrated with these simple measures as with the hyperinsulinemic clamp. The test characteristics of the logarithmic transformation of the homeostasis model assessment and the Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index are superior to other simple indices of insulin sensitivity. This helps explain their excellent correlations with formal measures both at baseline and with changes in insulin sensitivity and supports their broader application in clinical research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035182026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035182026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1210/jcem.86.11.7880

DO - 10.1210/jcem.86.11.7880

M3 - Article

C2 - 11701722

AN - SCOPUS:0035182026

VL - 86

SP - 5457

EP - 5464

JO - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism

JF - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism

SN - 0021-972X

IS - 11

ER -