Residency program solutions

Making a difference in quality residency education

Gregory Blake, Eric Skye, Wendy S. Biggs, Perry A. Pugno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Residency Program Solutions (RPS) consultants assist family medicine residency programs in solving issues perceived as limiting quality resident education. Residencies ask RPS to assist in preparing for accreditation site visits by the Residency Review Committee-Family Medicine (RC-FM). The RPS Criteria for Excellence in Family Medicine Education (RPS Criteria) may have influenced the accreditation standards of the RC-FM. RPS consultations also may affect accreditation visit cycle length and number of RC-FM citations. Methods: The authors reviewed the RC-FM Program Requirements for Family Medicine Residency Education and the RPS Criteria from 1978 to 2007, comparing statements between the two documents for "nearly verbatim" and equivalent "must" or "should" requirements. The average number of citations and cycle length for programs seeking a Comprehensive Accreditation Program (CAP) Consultation from 2004-2010 were compared to cohort programs evaluated at the same RC-FM meeting using an independent samples t test. Results: The strongest relationship between the RC-FM requirements and the RPS criteria occurred in 1983-1984. Nine "nearly verbatim" statements, 15 "must-should" or "must-must" statements, and 11 "should-should" statements existed. Over time, additional concurrences between organizational statements occurred. Residency programs with CAP consultations benefited significantly by both a decrease in number of citations and an increase in the length of accreditation cycle. Conclusions: The RPS Criteria have positively impacted iterations of RC-FM requirements. Family medicine residency programs concerned about successful accreditation by the RC-FM will likely benefit from RPS CAP consultations by increased length of accreditation cycle and/or a decreased number of citations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)187-192
Number of pages6
JournalFamily Medicine
Volume45
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Accreditation
Education
Medicine
Advisory Committees
Referral and Consultation
Consultants

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Blake, G., Skye, E., Biggs, W. S., & Pugno, P. A. (2013). Residency program solutions: Making a difference in quality residency education. Family Medicine, 45(3), 187-192.

Residency program solutions : Making a difference in quality residency education. / Blake, Gregory; Skye, Eric; Biggs, Wendy S.; Pugno, Perry A.

In: Family Medicine, Vol. 45, No. 3, 01.03.2013, p. 187-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blake, G, Skye, E, Biggs, WS & Pugno, PA 2013, 'Residency program solutions: Making a difference in quality residency education', Family Medicine, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 187-192.
Blake, Gregory ; Skye, Eric ; Biggs, Wendy S. ; Pugno, Perry A. / Residency program solutions : Making a difference in quality residency education. In: Family Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 45, No. 3. pp. 187-192.
@article{c4789a542e2944a0a050bf419b8fe0c6,
title = "Residency program solutions: Making a difference in quality residency education",
abstract = "Background: Residency Program Solutions (RPS) consultants assist family medicine residency programs in solving issues perceived as limiting quality resident education. Residencies ask RPS to assist in preparing for accreditation site visits by the Residency Review Committee-Family Medicine (RC-FM). The RPS Criteria for Excellence in Family Medicine Education (RPS Criteria) may have influenced the accreditation standards of the RC-FM. RPS consultations also may affect accreditation visit cycle length and number of RC-FM citations. Methods: The authors reviewed the RC-FM Program Requirements for Family Medicine Residency Education and the RPS Criteria from 1978 to 2007, comparing statements between the two documents for {"}nearly verbatim{"} and equivalent {"}must{"} or {"}should{"} requirements. The average number of citations and cycle length for programs seeking a Comprehensive Accreditation Program (CAP) Consultation from 2004-2010 were compared to cohort programs evaluated at the same RC-FM meeting using an independent samples t test. Results: The strongest relationship between the RC-FM requirements and the RPS criteria occurred in 1983-1984. Nine {"}nearly verbatim{"} statements, 15 {"}must-should{"} or {"}must-must{"} statements, and 11 {"}should-should{"} statements existed. Over time, additional concurrences between organizational statements occurred. Residency programs with CAP consultations benefited significantly by both a decrease in number of citations and an increase in the length of accreditation cycle. Conclusions: The RPS Criteria have positively impacted iterations of RC-FM requirements. Family medicine residency programs concerned about successful accreditation by the RC-FM will likely benefit from RPS CAP consultations by increased length of accreditation cycle and/or a decreased number of citations.",
author = "Gregory Blake and Eric Skye and Biggs, {Wendy S.} and Pugno, {Perry A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "187--192",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Residency program solutions

T2 - Making a difference in quality residency education

AU - Blake, Gregory

AU - Skye, Eric

AU - Biggs, Wendy S.

AU - Pugno, Perry A.

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - Background: Residency Program Solutions (RPS) consultants assist family medicine residency programs in solving issues perceived as limiting quality resident education. Residencies ask RPS to assist in preparing for accreditation site visits by the Residency Review Committee-Family Medicine (RC-FM). The RPS Criteria for Excellence in Family Medicine Education (RPS Criteria) may have influenced the accreditation standards of the RC-FM. RPS consultations also may affect accreditation visit cycle length and number of RC-FM citations. Methods: The authors reviewed the RC-FM Program Requirements for Family Medicine Residency Education and the RPS Criteria from 1978 to 2007, comparing statements between the two documents for "nearly verbatim" and equivalent "must" or "should" requirements. The average number of citations and cycle length for programs seeking a Comprehensive Accreditation Program (CAP) Consultation from 2004-2010 were compared to cohort programs evaluated at the same RC-FM meeting using an independent samples t test. Results: The strongest relationship between the RC-FM requirements and the RPS criteria occurred in 1983-1984. Nine "nearly verbatim" statements, 15 "must-should" or "must-must" statements, and 11 "should-should" statements existed. Over time, additional concurrences between organizational statements occurred. Residency programs with CAP consultations benefited significantly by both a decrease in number of citations and an increase in the length of accreditation cycle. Conclusions: The RPS Criteria have positively impacted iterations of RC-FM requirements. Family medicine residency programs concerned about successful accreditation by the RC-FM will likely benefit from RPS CAP consultations by increased length of accreditation cycle and/or a decreased number of citations.

AB - Background: Residency Program Solutions (RPS) consultants assist family medicine residency programs in solving issues perceived as limiting quality resident education. Residencies ask RPS to assist in preparing for accreditation site visits by the Residency Review Committee-Family Medicine (RC-FM). The RPS Criteria for Excellence in Family Medicine Education (RPS Criteria) may have influenced the accreditation standards of the RC-FM. RPS consultations also may affect accreditation visit cycle length and number of RC-FM citations. Methods: The authors reviewed the RC-FM Program Requirements for Family Medicine Residency Education and the RPS Criteria from 1978 to 2007, comparing statements between the two documents for "nearly verbatim" and equivalent "must" or "should" requirements. The average number of citations and cycle length for programs seeking a Comprehensive Accreditation Program (CAP) Consultation from 2004-2010 were compared to cohort programs evaluated at the same RC-FM meeting using an independent samples t test. Results: The strongest relationship between the RC-FM requirements and the RPS criteria occurred in 1983-1984. Nine "nearly verbatim" statements, 15 "must-should" or "must-must" statements, and 11 "should-should" statements existed. Over time, additional concurrences between organizational statements occurred. Residency programs with CAP consultations benefited significantly by both a decrease in number of citations and an increase in the length of accreditation cycle. Conclusions: The RPS Criteria have positively impacted iterations of RC-FM requirements. Family medicine residency programs concerned about successful accreditation by the RC-FM will likely benefit from RPS CAP consultations by increased length of accreditation cycle and/or a decreased number of citations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875334863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875334863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 187

EP - 192

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 3

ER -