Response stability and reliability in longitudinal health evaluations

E. Metter, E. L. Metter, P. T. Costa, L. J. Brant, A. Zonderman, J. L. Fozard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two approaches were used to study the stability over time and intravisit reliability of health questions and clinical medical examination items in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA). The stability of responses was determined by evaluating the medical history and physical examination completed at each visit to identify items that once answered in a positive manner, should continue to be answered positively over time. Stability for each question and subject was calculated by the number of positive responses following the first positive response divided by the total number of visits following the first positive response. For 35 questions answered by the subject, the stability was 58% by a simple average or 64% when weighted for the percentage of subjects who had a positive response to the question; for 10 physician-asked questions, the corresponding figures were 29% or 36%. Eighteen items from the physical examination had a stability of 34% or 37%. Intravisit reliability was estimated by comparing responses from the general health questionnaire to responses on the Cornell Medical Index completed at the same visit. Subject-completed questions had substantial agreement (Kappa=0.74, for questions worded the same), while physician-asked questions had moderate agreement (Kappa=0.44). (Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 4: 43–52, 1992)

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)43-52
Number of pages10
JournalAging clinical and experimental research
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Physical Examination
Cornell Medical Index
Physicians
Baltimore
Health
Longitudinal Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Aging
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Response stability and reliability in longitudinal health evaluations. / Metter, E.; Metter, E. L.; Costa, P. T.; Brant, L. J.; Zonderman, A.; Fozard, J. L.

In: Aging clinical and experimental research, Vol. 4, No. 1, 01.01.1992, p. 43-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Metter, E. ; Metter, E. L. ; Costa, P. T. ; Brant, L. J. ; Zonderman, A. ; Fozard, J. L. / Response stability and reliability in longitudinal health evaluations. In: Aging clinical and experimental research. 1992 ; Vol. 4, No. 1. pp. 43-52.
@article{1b463f5ec4f3496ca2d53b6bd9448594,
title = "Response stability and reliability in longitudinal health evaluations",
abstract = "Two approaches were used to study the stability over time and intravisit reliability of health questions and clinical medical examination items in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA). The stability of responses was determined by evaluating the medical history and physical examination completed at each visit to identify items that once answered in a positive manner, should continue to be answered positively over time. Stability for each question and subject was calculated by the number of positive responses following the first positive response divided by the total number of visits following the first positive response. For 35 questions answered by the subject, the stability was 58{\%} by a simple average or 64{\%} when weighted for the percentage of subjects who had a positive response to the question; for 10 physician-asked questions, the corresponding figures were 29{\%} or 36{\%}. Eighteen items from the physical examination had a stability of 34{\%} or 37{\%}. Intravisit reliability was estimated by comparing responses from the general health questionnaire to responses on the Cornell Medical Index completed at the same visit. Subject-completed questions had substantial agreement (Kappa=0.74, for questions worded the same), while physician-asked questions had moderate agreement (Kappa=0.44). (Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 4: 43–52, 1992)",
author = "E. Metter and Metter, {E. L.} and Costa, {P. T.} and Brant, {L. J.} and A. Zonderman and Fozard, {J. L.}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF03324065",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "43--52",
journal = "Aging clinical and experimental research",
issn = "1594-0667",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response stability and reliability in longitudinal health evaluations

AU - Metter, E.

AU - Metter, E. L.

AU - Costa, P. T.

AU - Brant, L. J.

AU - Zonderman, A.

AU - Fozard, J. L.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - Two approaches were used to study the stability over time and intravisit reliability of health questions and clinical medical examination items in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA). The stability of responses was determined by evaluating the medical history and physical examination completed at each visit to identify items that once answered in a positive manner, should continue to be answered positively over time. Stability for each question and subject was calculated by the number of positive responses following the first positive response divided by the total number of visits following the first positive response. For 35 questions answered by the subject, the stability was 58% by a simple average or 64% when weighted for the percentage of subjects who had a positive response to the question; for 10 physician-asked questions, the corresponding figures were 29% or 36%. Eighteen items from the physical examination had a stability of 34% or 37%. Intravisit reliability was estimated by comparing responses from the general health questionnaire to responses on the Cornell Medical Index completed at the same visit. Subject-completed questions had substantial agreement (Kappa=0.74, for questions worded the same), while physician-asked questions had moderate agreement (Kappa=0.44). (Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 4: 43–52, 1992)

AB - Two approaches were used to study the stability over time and intravisit reliability of health questions and clinical medical examination items in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA). The stability of responses was determined by evaluating the medical history and physical examination completed at each visit to identify items that once answered in a positive manner, should continue to be answered positively over time. Stability for each question and subject was calculated by the number of positive responses following the first positive response divided by the total number of visits following the first positive response. For 35 questions answered by the subject, the stability was 58% by a simple average or 64% when weighted for the percentage of subjects who had a positive response to the question; for 10 physician-asked questions, the corresponding figures were 29% or 36%. Eighteen items from the physical examination had a stability of 34% or 37%. Intravisit reliability was estimated by comparing responses from the general health questionnaire to responses on the Cornell Medical Index completed at the same visit. Subject-completed questions had substantial agreement (Kappa=0.74, for questions worded the same), while physician-asked questions had moderate agreement (Kappa=0.44). (Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 4: 43–52, 1992)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026559287&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026559287&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF03324065

DO - 10.1007/BF03324065

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 43

EP - 52

JO - Aging clinical and experimental research

JF - Aging clinical and experimental research

SN - 1594-0667

IS - 1

ER -