Retrieving "nonretrievable" inferior vena caval greenfield filters: A therapeutic option for filter malpositioning

Matthew A. Corriere, Marc A. Passman, Raul J. Guzman, Jeffery Dattilo, Thomas C. Naslund

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    14 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Filter malpositioning is a possible complication of inferior vena caval (IVC) filter insertion that may result in inadequate protection from pulmonary embolism. For non retrievable filters, this is traditionally managed with either observation or additional filter placement. The purpose of this study is determine the incidence of filter malpositioning after bedside insertion under duplex ultrasound (DUS) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance, and to report techniques for retrieving and repositioning IVC filters previously considered non retrievable. All IVC filter insertions performed under DUS or IVUS guidance over an 8-year period were identified. Data regarding insertion technique, device used, and technical success were retrospectively collected. Cases of IVC filter malpositioning were determined and form the basis of this study. Technical details for IVC filter retrieval and repositioning are described. Of 486 patients undergoing DUS (n = 435) or IVUS (n = 51) guided IVC filter insertion, 12 patients (2.4%) had inadequate positioning as determined by postoperative radiography. Two of these patients had no further filter manipulation, three had a second filter placed under fluoroscopic guidance, and the most recent five had filters retrieved and repositioned under fluoroscopic guidance. Of those patients undergoing retrieval and repositioning, all five had Greenfield filters, which are not traditionally regarded as retrievable. All attempted retrievals or replacements were technically successful without additional filter-related complications. Bedside IVC filter insertion under DUS or IVUS guidance has a low incidence of filter misplacement. Although not traditionally regarded as retrievable, Greenfield filters can be safely retrieved and repositioned using advanced endovascular techniques in the event of malpositioning.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)629-634
    Number of pages6
    JournalAnnals of Vascular Surgery
    Volume18
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

    Fingerprint

    Venae Cavae
    Therapeutics
    Endovascular Procedures
    Incidence
    Pulmonary Embolism
    Radiography
    Observation
    Equipment and Supplies

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Surgery
    • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

    Cite this

    Retrieving "nonretrievable" inferior vena caval greenfield filters : A therapeutic option for filter malpositioning. / Corriere, Matthew A.; Passman, Marc A.; Guzman, Raul J.; Dattilo, Jeffery; Naslund, Thomas C.

    In: Annals of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 18, No. 6, 01.01.2004, p. 629-634.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Corriere, Matthew A. ; Passman, Marc A. ; Guzman, Raul J. ; Dattilo, Jeffery ; Naslund, Thomas C. / Retrieving "nonretrievable" inferior vena caval greenfield filters : A therapeutic option for filter malpositioning. In: Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2004 ; Vol. 18, No. 6. pp. 629-634.
    @article{40a598764c8d4c0690d0fa80ecb58cf7,
    title = "Retrieving {"}nonretrievable{"} inferior vena caval greenfield filters: A therapeutic option for filter malpositioning",
    abstract = "Filter malpositioning is a possible complication of inferior vena caval (IVC) filter insertion that may result in inadequate protection from pulmonary embolism. For non retrievable filters, this is traditionally managed with either observation or additional filter placement. The purpose of this study is determine the incidence of filter malpositioning after bedside insertion under duplex ultrasound (DUS) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance, and to report techniques for retrieving and repositioning IVC filters previously considered non retrievable. All IVC filter insertions performed under DUS or IVUS guidance over an 8-year period were identified. Data regarding insertion technique, device used, and technical success were retrospectively collected. Cases of IVC filter malpositioning were determined and form the basis of this study. Technical details for IVC filter retrieval and repositioning are described. Of 486 patients undergoing DUS (n = 435) or IVUS (n = 51) guided IVC filter insertion, 12 patients (2.4{\%}) had inadequate positioning as determined by postoperative radiography. Two of these patients had no further filter manipulation, three had a second filter placed under fluoroscopic guidance, and the most recent five had filters retrieved and repositioned under fluoroscopic guidance. Of those patients undergoing retrieval and repositioning, all five had Greenfield filters, which are not traditionally regarded as retrievable. All attempted retrievals or replacements were technically successful without additional filter-related complications. Bedside IVC filter insertion under DUS or IVUS guidance has a low incidence of filter misplacement. Although not traditionally regarded as retrievable, Greenfield filters can be safely retrieved and repositioned using advanced endovascular techniques in the event of malpositioning.",
    author = "Corriere, {Matthew A.} and Passman, {Marc A.} and Guzman, {Raul J.} and Jeffery Dattilo and Naslund, {Thomas C.}",
    year = "2004",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1007/s10016-004-0099-1",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "18",
    pages = "629--634",
    journal = "Annals of Vascular Surgery",
    issn = "0890-5096",
    publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
    number = "6",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Retrieving "nonretrievable" inferior vena caval greenfield filters

    T2 - A therapeutic option for filter malpositioning

    AU - Corriere, Matthew A.

    AU - Passman, Marc A.

    AU - Guzman, Raul J.

    AU - Dattilo, Jeffery

    AU - Naslund, Thomas C.

    PY - 2004/1/1

    Y1 - 2004/1/1

    N2 - Filter malpositioning is a possible complication of inferior vena caval (IVC) filter insertion that may result in inadequate protection from pulmonary embolism. For non retrievable filters, this is traditionally managed with either observation or additional filter placement. The purpose of this study is determine the incidence of filter malpositioning after bedside insertion under duplex ultrasound (DUS) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance, and to report techniques for retrieving and repositioning IVC filters previously considered non retrievable. All IVC filter insertions performed under DUS or IVUS guidance over an 8-year period were identified. Data regarding insertion technique, device used, and technical success were retrospectively collected. Cases of IVC filter malpositioning were determined and form the basis of this study. Technical details for IVC filter retrieval and repositioning are described. Of 486 patients undergoing DUS (n = 435) or IVUS (n = 51) guided IVC filter insertion, 12 patients (2.4%) had inadequate positioning as determined by postoperative radiography. Two of these patients had no further filter manipulation, three had a second filter placed under fluoroscopic guidance, and the most recent five had filters retrieved and repositioned under fluoroscopic guidance. Of those patients undergoing retrieval and repositioning, all five had Greenfield filters, which are not traditionally regarded as retrievable. All attempted retrievals or replacements were technically successful without additional filter-related complications. Bedside IVC filter insertion under DUS or IVUS guidance has a low incidence of filter misplacement. Although not traditionally regarded as retrievable, Greenfield filters can be safely retrieved and repositioned using advanced endovascular techniques in the event of malpositioning.

    AB - Filter malpositioning is a possible complication of inferior vena caval (IVC) filter insertion that may result in inadequate protection from pulmonary embolism. For non retrievable filters, this is traditionally managed with either observation or additional filter placement. The purpose of this study is determine the incidence of filter malpositioning after bedside insertion under duplex ultrasound (DUS) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance, and to report techniques for retrieving and repositioning IVC filters previously considered non retrievable. All IVC filter insertions performed under DUS or IVUS guidance over an 8-year period were identified. Data regarding insertion technique, device used, and technical success were retrospectively collected. Cases of IVC filter malpositioning were determined and form the basis of this study. Technical details for IVC filter retrieval and repositioning are described. Of 486 patients undergoing DUS (n = 435) or IVUS (n = 51) guided IVC filter insertion, 12 patients (2.4%) had inadequate positioning as determined by postoperative radiography. Two of these patients had no further filter manipulation, three had a second filter placed under fluoroscopic guidance, and the most recent five had filters retrieved and repositioned under fluoroscopic guidance. Of those patients undergoing retrieval and repositioning, all five had Greenfield filters, which are not traditionally regarded as retrievable. All attempted retrievals or replacements were technically successful without additional filter-related complications. Bedside IVC filter insertion under DUS or IVUS guidance has a low incidence of filter misplacement. Although not traditionally regarded as retrievable, Greenfield filters can be safely retrieved and repositioned using advanced endovascular techniques in the event of malpositioning.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12144269206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12144269206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s10016-004-0099-1

    DO - 10.1007/s10016-004-0099-1

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 15599618

    AN - SCOPUS:12144269206

    VL - 18

    SP - 629

    EP - 634

    JO - Annals of Vascular Surgery

    JF - Annals of Vascular Surgery

    SN - 0890-5096

    IS - 6

    ER -