Review article

The evolving role of information technology in perioperative patient safety

Michael Stabile, Raymond Cooper

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The adoption of new technologies in medicine is frequently met with both enthusiasm and resistance. The universal adoption of health information technology (IT) and anesthesia information management systems (AIMS) remains low despite the potential benefits. Electronic medical records, and hence AIMS, are at the intersection of patient safety. This article highlights advantages and barriers to adoption and implementation of IT in general and AIMS in particular, with a focus on clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and computerized physician order entry (CPOE) as hallmarks that may lead to improvement in patient safety and quality in the perioperative setting. Principal findings: The advantages of health IT and AIMS include improved legibility of documentation; the ability to integrate new scientific evidence into practice; enhanced management and exchange of complex health information; the ability to standardize order sets, incorporate computerized physician order entry, and provide clinical decision support; and the ability to capture data for management, research, and quality monitoring and reporting. While not foolproof, AIMS have been shown to improve safety, quality, and patient outcomes. Barriers to the adoption of health IT and AIMS include costs, lack of truly interoperable AIMS components in health-system IT solutions, and lack of clinician involvement in implementation, planning, design, and installation of many IT or AIMS products. Conclusions: Health IT and AIMS are at the intersection of patient safety and technology. Anesthesiologists are perfectly positioned to be the physician leaders of adoption, design, implementation, and integration, not only for AIMS but also for health-system IT solutions in general.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-126
Number of pages8
JournalCanadian Journal of Anesthesia
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2013

Fingerprint

Management Information Systems
Patient Safety
Medical Informatics
Anesthesia
Technology
Medical Order Entry Systems
Clinical Decision Support Systems
Electronic Health Records
Documentation
General Anesthesia
Medicine

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Review article : The evolving role of information technology in perioperative patient safety. / Stabile, Michael; Cooper, Raymond.

In: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol. 60, No. 2, 01.02.2013, p. 119-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{4ab50f3f68e348c5876baa8a2e95932f,
title = "Review article: The evolving role of information technology in perioperative patient safety",
abstract = "Purpose: The adoption of new technologies in medicine is frequently met with both enthusiasm and resistance. The universal adoption of health information technology (IT) and anesthesia information management systems (AIMS) remains low despite the potential benefits. Electronic medical records, and hence AIMS, are at the intersection of patient safety. This article highlights advantages and barriers to adoption and implementation of IT in general and AIMS in particular, with a focus on clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and computerized physician order entry (CPOE) as hallmarks that may lead to improvement in patient safety and quality in the perioperative setting. Principal findings: The advantages of health IT and AIMS include improved legibility of documentation; the ability to integrate new scientific evidence into practice; enhanced management and exchange of complex health information; the ability to standardize order sets, incorporate computerized physician order entry, and provide clinical decision support; and the ability to capture data for management, research, and quality monitoring and reporting. While not foolproof, AIMS have been shown to improve safety, quality, and patient outcomes. Barriers to the adoption of health IT and AIMS include costs, lack of truly interoperable AIMS components in health-system IT solutions, and lack of clinician involvement in implementation, planning, design, and installation of many IT or AIMS products. Conclusions: Health IT and AIMS are at the intersection of patient safety and technology. Anesthesiologists are perfectly positioned to be the physician leaders of adoption, design, implementation, and integration, not only for AIMS but also for health-system IT solutions in general.",
author = "Michael Stabile and Raymond Cooper",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12630-012-9851-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "119--126",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia",
issn = "0832-610X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review article

T2 - The evolving role of information technology in perioperative patient safety

AU - Stabile, Michael

AU - Cooper, Raymond

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - Purpose: The adoption of new technologies in medicine is frequently met with both enthusiasm and resistance. The universal adoption of health information technology (IT) and anesthesia information management systems (AIMS) remains low despite the potential benefits. Electronic medical records, and hence AIMS, are at the intersection of patient safety. This article highlights advantages and barriers to adoption and implementation of IT in general and AIMS in particular, with a focus on clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and computerized physician order entry (CPOE) as hallmarks that may lead to improvement in patient safety and quality in the perioperative setting. Principal findings: The advantages of health IT and AIMS include improved legibility of documentation; the ability to integrate new scientific evidence into practice; enhanced management and exchange of complex health information; the ability to standardize order sets, incorporate computerized physician order entry, and provide clinical decision support; and the ability to capture data for management, research, and quality monitoring and reporting. While not foolproof, AIMS have been shown to improve safety, quality, and patient outcomes. Barriers to the adoption of health IT and AIMS include costs, lack of truly interoperable AIMS components in health-system IT solutions, and lack of clinician involvement in implementation, planning, design, and installation of many IT or AIMS products. Conclusions: Health IT and AIMS are at the intersection of patient safety and technology. Anesthesiologists are perfectly positioned to be the physician leaders of adoption, design, implementation, and integration, not only for AIMS but also for health-system IT solutions in general.

AB - Purpose: The adoption of new technologies in medicine is frequently met with both enthusiasm and resistance. The universal adoption of health information technology (IT) and anesthesia information management systems (AIMS) remains low despite the potential benefits. Electronic medical records, and hence AIMS, are at the intersection of patient safety. This article highlights advantages and barriers to adoption and implementation of IT in general and AIMS in particular, with a focus on clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and computerized physician order entry (CPOE) as hallmarks that may lead to improvement in patient safety and quality in the perioperative setting. Principal findings: The advantages of health IT and AIMS include improved legibility of documentation; the ability to integrate new scientific evidence into practice; enhanced management and exchange of complex health information; the ability to standardize order sets, incorporate computerized physician order entry, and provide clinical decision support; and the ability to capture data for management, research, and quality monitoring and reporting. While not foolproof, AIMS have been shown to improve safety, quality, and patient outcomes. Barriers to the adoption of health IT and AIMS include costs, lack of truly interoperable AIMS components in health-system IT solutions, and lack of clinician involvement in implementation, planning, design, and installation of many IT or AIMS products. Conclusions: Health IT and AIMS are at the intersection of patient safety and technology. Anesthesiologists are perfectly positioned to be the physician leaders of adoption, design, implementation, and integration, not only for AIMS but also for health-system IT solutions in general.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878436563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878436563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12630-012-9851-0

DO - 10.1007/s12630-012-9851-0

M3 - Review article

VL - 60

SP - 119

EP - 126

JO - Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia

JF - Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia

SN - 0832-610X

IS - 2

ER -