Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers

Pharmacy Practice 2017 peer reviewers

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer?.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1236
JournalPharmacy Practice
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Peer Review
Manuscripts
PubMed
Publications

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pharmacy
  • Pharmaceutical Science

Cite this

Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers. / Pharmacy Practice 2017 peer reviewers.

In: Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1236, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Pharmacy Practice 2017 peer reviewers. / Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers. In: Pharmacy Practice. 2018 ; Vol. 16, No. 1.
@article{93c93f8abd544ef698b23c6482e1a097,
title = "Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers",
abstract = "The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer?.",
author = "{Pharmacy Practice 2017 peer reviewers} and Fernando Fernandez-Llimos and Berti, {Andrew D.} and Denise Yeung and Yusuff, {Kazeem B.} and {El Zowalaty}, {Mohamed E.} and Adane, {Eyob D.} and Sinaa Al-Aqeel and Al-Jumaili, {Ali Azeez} and Edita Alili-Idrizi and Marija Andelkovic and Anil Aranha and Mohammad Arief and Wiwat Arkaravichien and Xavier Armoiry and Attarabeen, {Omar F.} and Nehad Ayoub and Bajorek, {Beata V.} and Paul Beninger and Billups, {Sarah J.} and Bowen, {Jane F.} and Carla Bouwmeester and Patrick Campbell and Vincent Chan and Connor, {Sharon E.} and Danziger, {Larry H.} and Dawood, {Omar T.} and Mark Dunnenberger and Selwa Elrouby and Souhiela Fakih and {Abu Farha}, {Rana K.} and Figueiredo, {Isabel V.} and Nazanin Foroutan and Forsythe, {Lauren E.} and Frail, {Caitlin K.} and Dan Friesner and Kylie Funk and Caroline Gaither and Gallimore, {Casey E.} and Vincent Gan and Garcia, {Beate H.} and Gaskins, {Jessica L.} and Gastelurrutia, {Miguel A.} and Justin Gatwood and Genord, {Cheryl K.} and Eric Gilliam and Goodbar, {Nancy Hope} and Maxine Gossell-Williams and Quinn Grundy and Line Gu{\'e}nette and Justin Gatwood",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
journal = "Pharmacy Practice",
issn = "1885-642X",
publisher = "Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers

AU - Pharmacy Practice 2017 peer reviewers

AU - Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando

AU - Berti, Andrew D.

AU - Yeung, Denise

AU - Yusuff, Kazeem B.

AU - El Zowalaty, Mohamed E.

AU - Adane, Eyob D.

AU - Al-Aqeel, Sinaa

AU - Al-Jumaili, Ali Azeez

AU - Alili-Idrizi, Edita

AU - Andelkovic, Marija

AU - Aranha, Anil

AU - Arief, Mohammad

AU - Arkaravichien, Wiwat

AU - Armoiry, Xavier

AU - Attarabeen, Omar F.

AU - Ayoub, Nehad

AU - Bajorek, Beata V.

AU - Beninger, Paul

AU - Billups, Sarah J.

AU - Bowen, Jane F.

AU - Bouwmeester, Carla

AU - Campbell, Patrick

AU - Chan, Vincent

AU - Connor, Sharon E.

AU - Danziger, Larry H.

AU - Dawood, Omar T.

AU - Dunnenberger, Mark

AU - Elrouby, Selwa

AU - Fakih, Souhiela

AU - Abu Farha, Rana K.

AU - Figueiredo, Isabel V.

AU - Foroutan, Nazanin

AU - Forsythe, Lauren E.

AU - Frail, Caitlin K.

AU - Friesner, Dan

AU - Funk, Kylie

AU - Gaither, Caroline

AU - Gallimore, Casey E.

AU - Gan, Vincent

AU - Garcia, Beate H.

AU - Gaskins, Jessica L.

AU - Gastelurrutia, Miguel A.

AU - Gatwood, Justin

AU - Genord, Cheryl K.

AU - Gilliam, Eric

AU - Goodbar, Nancy Hope

AU - Gossell-Williams, Maxine

AU - Grundy, Quinn

AU - Guénette, Line

AU - Gatwood, Justin

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer?.

AB - The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer?.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056509328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056509328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236

DO - 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236

M3 - Editorial

VL - 16

JO - Pharmacy Practice

JF - Pharmacy Practice

SN - 1885-642X

IS - 1

M1 - 1236

ER -