Should vein be saved for future operations? A 15-year review of infrainguinal bypasses and the subsequent need for autogenous vein

Lawrence F. Poletti, John H. Matsuura, Jeffery Dattilo, Marc P. Posner, Hyung M. Lee, Michael Scouvart, Michael Sobel

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    22 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The decision to use prosthetic or autogenous vein as the initial conduit for first-time vascular bypass of the lower extremity depends in part on the likelihood of subsequent need for autogenous conduit for another leg or heart bypass. The true frequency of these later events is not known. To answer this question, we analyzed a database of infrainguinal and coronary artery bypasses (CABG) performed at one institution between January 1980 and July 1995, to determine how many patients required subsequent infrainguinal bypass or CABG after their initial leg bypass. Five hundred and seventy-two infrainguinal bypasses were performed on 440 patients (mean age 63.9); average follow-up was 5.6 years. The clinical philosophy favored autogenous vein for first bypass, which was used in 84% of first operations performed during the study period while prosthetic material was used in 16%. For patients in which vein was used for the first operation, and who went on to have a second operation, the use of prosthetic conduit rose from 16% of operations to 27% (p < 0.05). The rate of subsequent CABG after leg bypass was very low, 2% at 5 years, 3% at 10 years. The cumulative probability of requiring a subsequent infrainguinal bypass was 27% at 5 years, 32% at 10 years. Of these, 46% were ipsilateral and 54% were contralateral. Considering only subsequent tibial bypasses (where vein might be considered obligatory), the cumulative 5-year rate of subsequent leg bypass was only 13%. Another bypass was most likely to occur within the first 3 years, rarely thereafter. In summary, after primary infrainguinal bypass, additional procedures using vein may arise in 1/2 to 1/3 of patients, mostly in the first 3 years. However, only 13% will definitely need vein for tibial bypass in 5 years, and subsequent CABG is uncommon.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)143-147
    Number of pages5
    JournalAnnals of Vascular Surgery
    Volume12
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

    Fingerprint

    Veins
    Leg
    Coronary Artery Bypass
    Blood Vessels
    Lower Extremity
    Databases

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Surgery
    • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

    Cite this

    Should vein be saved for future operations? A 15-year review of infrainguinal bypasses and the subsequent need for autogenous vein. / Poletti, Lawrence F.; Matsuura, John H.; Dattilo, Jeffery; Posner, Marc P.; Lee, Hyung M.; Scouvart, Michael; Sobel, Michael.

    In: Annals of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.01.1998, p. 143-147.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Poletti, Lawrence F. ; Matsuura, John H. ; Dattilo, Jeffery ; Posner, Marc P. ; Lee, Hyung M. ; Scouvart, Michael ; Sobel, Michael. / Should vein be saved for future operations? A 15-year review of infrainguinal bypasses and the subsequent need for autogenous vein. In: Annals of Vascular Surgery. 1998 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 143-147.
    @article{550aec118bd1430180048a78c034b4f6,
    title = "Should vein be saved for future operations? A 15-year review of infrainguinal bypasses and the subsequent need for autogenous vein",
    abstract = "The decision to use prosthetic or autogenous vein as the initial conduit for first-time vascular bypass of the lower extremity depends in part on the likelihood of subsequent need for autogenous conduit for another leg or heart bypass. The true frequency of these later events is not known. To answer this question, we analyzed a database of infrainguinal and coronary artery bypasses (CABG) performed at one institution between January 1980 and July 1995, to determine how many patients required subsequent infrainguinal bypass or CABG after their initial leg bypass. Five hundred and seventy-two infrainguinal bypasses were performed on 440 patients (mean age 63.9); average follow-up was 5.6 years. The clinical philosophy favored autogenous vein for first bypass, which was used in 84{\%} of first operations performed during the study period while prosthetic material was used in 16{\%}. For patients in which vein was used for the first operation, and who went on to have a second operation, the use of prosthetic conduit rose from 16{\%} of operations to 27{\%} (p < 0.05). The rate of subsequent CABG after leg bypass was very low, 2{\%} at 5 years, 3{\%} at 10 years. The cumulative probability of requiring a subsequent infrainguinal bypass was 27{\%} at 5 years, 32{\%} at 10 years. Of these, 46{\%} were ipsilateral and 54{\%} were contralateral. Considering only subsequent tibial bypasses (where vein might be considered obligatory), the cumulative 5-year rate of subsequent leg bypass was only 13{\%}. Another bypass was most likely to occur within the first 3 years, rarely thereafter. In summary, after primary infrainguinal bypass, additional procedures using vein may arise in 1/2 to 1/3 of patients, mostly in the first 3 years. However, only 13{\%} will definitely need vein for tibial bypass in 5 years, and subsequent CABG is uncommon.",
    author = "Poletti, {Lawrence F.} and Matsuura, {John H.} and Jeffery Dattilo and Posner, {Marc P.} and Lee, {Hyung M.} and Michael Scouvart and Michael Sobel",
    year = "1998",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1007/s100169900131",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "143--147",
    journal = "Annals of Vascular Surgery",
    issn = "0890-5096",
    publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Should vein be saved for future operations? A 15-year review of infrainguinal bypasses and the subsequent need for autogenous vein

    AU - Poletti, Lawrence F.

    AU - Matsuura, John H.

    AU - Dattilo, Jeffery

    AU - Posner, Marc P.

    AU - Lee, Hyung M.

    AU - Scouvart, Michael

    AU - Sobel, Michael

    PY - 1998/1/1

    Y1 - 1998/1/1

    N2 - The decision to use prosthetic or autogenous vein as the initial conduit for first-time vascular bypass of the lower extremity depends in part on the likelihood of subsequent need for autogenous conduit for another leg or heart bypass. The true frequency of these later events is not known. To answer this question, we analyzed a database of infrainguinal and coronary artery bypasses (CABG) performed at one institution between January 1980 and July 1995, to determine how many patients required subsequent infrainguinal bypass or CABG after their initial leg bypass. Five hundred and seventy-two infrainguinal bypasses were performed on 440 patients (mean age 63.9); average follow-up was 5.6 years. The clinical philosophy favored autogenous vein for first bypass, which was used in 84% of first operations performed during the study period while prosthetic material was used in 16%. For patients in which vein was used for the first operation, and who went on to have a second operation, the use of prosthetic conduit rose from 16% of operations to 27% (p < 0.05). The rate of subsequent CABG after leg bypass was very low, 2% at 5 years, 3% at 10 years. The cumulative probability of requiring a subsequent infrainguinal bypass was 27% at 5 years, 32% at 10 years. Of these, 46% were ipsilateral and 54% were contralateral. Considering only subsequent tibial bypasses (where vein might be considered obligatory), the cumulative 5-year rate of subsequent leg bypass was only 13%. Another bypass was most likely to occur within the first 3 years, rarely thereafter. In summary, after primary infrainguinal bypass, additional procedures using vein may arise in 1/2 to 1/3 of patients, mostly in the first 3 years. However, only 13% will definitely need vein for tibial bypass in 5 years, and subsequent CABG is uncommon.

    AB - The decision to use prosthetic or autogenous vein as the initial conduit for first-time vascular bypass of the lower extremity depends in part on the likelihood of subsequent need for autogenous conduit for another leg or heart bypass. The true frequency of these later events is not known. To answer this question, we analyzed a database of infrainguinal and coronary artery bypasses (CABG) performed at one institution between January 1980 and July 1995, to determine how many patients required subsequent infrainguinal bypass or CABG after their initial leg bypass. Five hundred and seventy-two infrainguinal bypasses were performed on 440 patients (mean age 63.9); average follow-up was 5.6 years. The clinical philosophy favored autogenous vein for first bypass, which was used in 84% of first operations performed during the study period while prosthetic material was used in 16%. For patients in which vein was used for the first operation, and who went on to have a second operation, the use of prosthetic conduit rose from 16% of operations to 27% (p < 0.05). The rate of subsequent CABG after leg bypass was very low, 2% at 5 years, 3% at 10 years. The cumulative probability of requiring a subsequent infrainguinal bypass was 27% at 5 years, 32% at 10 years. Of these, 46% were ipsilateral and 54% were contralateral. Considering only subsequent tibial bypasses (where vein might be considered obligatory), the cumulative 5-year rate of subsequent leg bypass was only 13%. Another bypass was most likely to occur within the first 3 years, rarely thereafter. In summary, after primary infrainguinal bypass, additional procedures using vein may arise in 1/2 to 1/3 of patients, mostly in the first 3 years. However, only 13% will definitely need vein for tibial bypass in 5 years, and subsequent CABG is uncommon.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031883450&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031883450&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s100169900131

    DO - 10.1007/s100169900131

    M3 - Article

    VL - 12

    SP - 143

    EP - 147

    JO - Annals of Vascular Surgery

    JF - Annals of Vascular Surgery

    SN - 0890-5096

    IS - 2

    ER -