Sorption and solubility of resin-based restorative dental materials

Manuel Toledano, Raquel Osorio, Estrella Osorio, Victoria Fuentes, Carlo Prati, Franklin Garcia-Godoy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. To measure the water sorption and solubility of different resin-based restorative dental materials. Methods. Eight commercial restorative materials were selected: two resin composites (Z100 and Prodigy), four polyacid-modified resin composites (Compoglass, Compoglass F, Dyract and Dyract AP), and two light-cured glass ionomers (Vitremer and Fuji II LC). Five disc specimens were prepared of each material, following the manufacturer's instructions, and were grounded wet with silicon carbide paper. Water sorption and solubility of the different materials were calculated by means of weighting the samples before and after water immersion and desiccation. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests (P<0.05). Results. Compoglass and Compoglass F showed the lowest values of water sorption and solubility, while Vitremer and Fuji II LC displayed the highest values. Solubility values of Prodigy, Z100, Dyract and Dyract AP did not show significant differences among them, while their water sorption values attained some differences and were lower for Prodigy followed by Dyract and Z100. Conclusions. The attained water sorption and solubility values are mainly influenced by the generic type of material and variations occurring between materials of the same type may result from differences in resin matrix compositions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)43-50
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Dentistry
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dental Materials
Solubility
Water
Compomers
Desiccation
Immersion
Analysis of Variance
Dyract
Students
Light
Compoglass
Prodigy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Sorption and solubility of resin-based restorative dental materials. / Toledano, Manuel; Osorio, Raquel; Osorio, Estrella; Fuentes, Victoria; Prati, Carlo; Garcia-Godoy, Franklin.

In: Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 43-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Toledano, Manuel ; Osorio, Raquel ; Osorio, Estrella ; Fuentes, Victoria ; Prati, Carlo ; Garcia-Godoy, Franklin. / Sorption and solubility of resin-based restorative dental materials. In: Journal of Dentistry. 2003 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 43-50.
@article{9e5d8f97a3fc4817908166c36b9fa34f,
title = "Sorption and solubility of resin-based restorative dental materials",
abstract = "Objectives. To measure the water sorption and solubility of different resin-based restorative dental materials. Methods. Eight commercial restorative materials were selected: two resin composites (Z100 and Prodigy), four polyacid-modified resin composites (Compoglass, Compoglass F, Dyract and Dyract AP), and two light-cured glass ionomers (Vitremer and Fuji II LC). Five disc specimens were prepared of each material, following the manufacturer's instructions, and were grounded wet with silicon carbide paper. Water sorption and solubility of the different materials were calculated by means of weighting the samples before and after water immersion and desiccation. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests (P<0.05). Results. Compoglass and Compoglass F showed the lowest values of water sorption and solubility, while Vitremer and Fuji II LC displayed the highest values. Solubility values of Prodigy, Z100, Dyract and Dyract AP did not show significant differences among them, while their water sorption values attained some differences and were lower for Prodigy followed by Dyract and Z100. Conclusions. The attained water sorption and solubility values are mainly influenced by the generic type of material and variations occurring between materials of the same type may result from differences in resin matrix compositions.",
author = "Manuel Toledano and Raquel Osorio and Estrella Osorio and Victoria Fuentes and Carlo Prati and Franklin Garcia-Godoy",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00083-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "43--50",
journal = "Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0300-5712",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sorption and solubility of resin-based restorative dental materials

AU - Toledano, Manuel

AU - Osorio, Raquel

AU - Osorio, Estrella

AU - Fuentes, Victoria

AU - Prati, Carlo

AU - Garcia-Godoy, Franklin

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Objectives. To measure the water sorption and solubility of different resin-based restorative dental materials. Methods. Eight commercial restorative materials were selected: two resin composites (Z100 and Prodigy), four polyacid-modified resin composites (Compoglass, Compoglass F, Dyract and Dyract AP), and two light-cured glass ionomers (Vitremer and Fuji II LC). Five disc specimens were prepared of each material, following the manufacturer's instructions, and were grounded wet with silicon carbide paper. Water sorption and solubility of the different materials were calculated by means of weighting the samples before and after water immersion and desiccation. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests (P<0.05). Results. Compoglass and Compoglass F showed the lowest values of water sorption and solubility, while Vitremer and Fuji II LC displayed the highest values. Solubility values of Prodigy, Z100, Dyract and Dyract AP did not show significant differences among them, while their water sorption values attained some differences and were lower for Prodigy followed by Dyract and Z100. Conclusions. The attained water sorption and solubility values are mainly influenced by the generic type of material and variations occurring between materials of the same type may result from differences in resin matrix compositions.

AB - Objectives. To measure the water sorption and solubility of different resin-based restorative dental materials. Methods. Eight commercial restorative materials were selected: two resin composites (Z100 and Prodigy), four polyacid-modified resin composites (Compoglass, Compoglass F, Dyract and Dyract AP), and two light-cured glass ionomers (Vitremer and Fuji II LC). Five disc specimens were prepared of each material, following the manufacturer's instructions, and were grounded wet with silicon carbide paper. Water sorption and solubility of the different materials were calculated by means of weighting the samples before and after water immersion and desiccation. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests (P<0.05). Results. Compoglass and Compoglass F showed the lowest values of water sorption and solubility, while Vitremer and Fuji II LC displayed the highest values. Solubility values of Prodigy, Z100, Dyract and Dyract AP did not show significant differences among them, while their water sorption values attained some differences and were lower for Prodigy followed by Dyract and Z100. Conclusions. The attained water sorption and solubility values are mainly influenced by the generic type of material and variations occurring between materials of the same type may result from differences in resin matrix compositions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038106442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038106442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00083-0

DO - 10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00083-0

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 43

EP - 50

JO - Journal of Dentistry

JF - Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0300-5712

IS - 1

ER -