Standardized reporting for congenital diaphragmatic hernia - An international consensus

Kevin P. Lally, Robert E. Lasky, Pamela A. Lally, Pietro Bagolan, Carl F. Davis, Bjorn P. Frenckner, Ronald M. Hirschl, Max Langham, Terry L. Buchmiller, Noriaki Usui, Dick Tibboel, Jay M. Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/purpose: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) remains a significant cause of neonatal death. A wide spectrum of disease severity and treatment strategies makes comparisons challenging. The objective of this study was to create a standardized reporting system for CDH. Methods: Data were prospectively collected on all live born infants with CDH from 51 centers in 9 countries. Patients who underwent surgical correction had the diaphragmatic defect size graded (A-D) using a standardized system. Other data known to affect outcome were combined to create a usable staging system. The primary outcome was death or hospital discharge. Results: A total of 1,975 infants were evaluated. A total of 326 infants were not repaired, and all died. Of the remaining 1,649, the defect was scored in 1,638 patients. A small defect (A) had a high survival, while a large defect was much worse. Cardiac defects significantly worsened outcome. We grouped patients into 6 categories based on defect size with an isolated A defect as stage I. A major cardiac anomaly (+) placed the patient in the next higher stage. Applying this, patient survival is 99% for stage I, 96% stage II, 78% stage III, 58% stage IV, 39% stage V, and 0% for non-repair. Conclusions: The size of the diaphragmatic defect and a severe cardiac anomaly are strongly associated with outcome. Standardizing reporting is imperative in determining optimal outcomes and effective therapies for CDH and could serve as a benchmark for prospective trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2408-2415
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of pediatric surgery
Volume48
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2013

Fingerprint

Benchmarking
Survival
Cause of Death
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernias
Therapeutics
Perinatal Death

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Lally, K. P., Lasky, R. E., Lally, P. A., Bagolan, P., Davis, C. F., Frenckner, B. P., ... Wilson, J. M. (2013). Standardized reporting for congenital diaphragmatic hernia - An international consensus. Journal of pediatric surgery, 48(12), 2408-2415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.08.014

Standardized reporting for congenital diaphragmatic hernia - An international consensus. / Lally, Kevin P.; Lasky, Robert E.; Lally, Pamela A.; Bagolan, Pietro; Davis, Carl F.; Frenckner, Bjorn P.; Hirschl, Ronald M.; Langham, Max; Buchmiller, Terry L.; Usui, Noriaki; Tibboel, Dick; Wilson, Jay M.

In: Journal of pediatric surgery, Vol. 48, No. 12, 01.12.2013, p. 2408-2415.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lally, KP, Lasky, RE, Lally, PA, Bagolan, P, Davis, CF, Frenckner, BP, Hirschl, RM, Langham, M, Buchmiller, TL, Usui, N, Tibboel, D & Wilson, JM 2013, 'Standardized reporting for congenital diaphragmatic hernia - An international consensus', Journal of pediatric surgery, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 2408-2415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.08.014
Lally, Kevin P. ; Lasky, Robert E. ; Lally, Pamela A. ; Bagolan, Pietro ; Davis, Carl F. ; Frenckner, Bjorn P. ; Hirschl, Ronald M. ; Langham, Max ; Buchmiller, Terry L. ; Usui, Noriaki ; Tibboel, Dick ; Wilson, Jay M. / Standardized reporting for congenital diaphragmatic hernia - An international consensus. In: Journal of pediatric surgery. 2013 ; Vol. 48, No. 12. pp. 2408-2415.
@article{f2bb84f241524fd99ff6292f50ec27e1,
title = "Standardized reporting for congenital diaphragmatic hernia - An international consensus",
abstract = "Background/purpose: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) remains a significant cause of neonatal death. A wide spectrum of disease severity and treatment strategies makes comparisons challenging. The objective of this study was to create a standardized reporting system for CDH. Methods: Data were prospectively collected on all live born infants with CDH from 51 centers in 9 countries. Patients who underwent surgical correction had the diaphragmatic defect size graded (A-D) using a standardized system. Other data known to affect outcome were combined to create a usable staging system. The primary outcome was death or hospital discharge. Results: A total of 1,975 infants were evaluated. A total of 326 infants were not repaired, and all died. Of the remaining 1,649, the defect was scored in 1,638 patients. A small defect (A) had a high survival, while a large defect was much worse. Cardiac defects significantly worsened outcome. We grouped patients into 6 categories based on defect size with an isolated A defect as stage I. A major cardiac anomaly (+) placed the patient in the next higher stage. Applying this, patient survival is 99{\%} for stage I, 96{\%} stage II, 78{\%} stage III, 58{\%} stage IV, 39{\%} stage V, and 0{\%} for non-repair. Conclusions: The size of the diaphragmatic defect and a severe cardiac anomaly are strongly associated with outcome. Standardizing reporting is imperative in determining optimal outcomes and effective therapies for CDH and could serve as a benchmark for prospective trials.",
author = "Lally, {Kevin P.} and Lasky, {Robert E.} and Lally, {Pamela A.} and Pietro Bagolan and Davis, {Carl F.} and Frenckner, {Bjorn P.} and Hirschl, {Ronald M.} and Max Langham and Buchmiller, {Terry L.} and Noriaki Usui and Dick Tibboel and Wilson, {Jay M.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.08.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "2408--2415",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standardized reporting for congenital diaphragmatic hernia - An international consensus

AU - Lally, Kevin P.

AU - Lasky, Robert E.

AU - Lally, Pamela A.

AU - Bagolan, Pietro

AU - Davis, Carl F.

AU - Frenckner, Bjorn P.

AU - Hirschl, Ronald M.

AU - Langham, Max

AU - Buchmiller, Terry L.

AU - Usui, Noriaki

AU - Tibboel, Dick

AU - Wilson, Jay M.

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - Background/purpose: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) remains a significant cause of neonatal death. A wide spectrum of disease severity and treatment strategies makes comparisons challenging. The objective of this study was to create a standardized reporting system for CDH. Methods: Data were prospectively collected on all live born infants with CDH from 51 centers in 9 countries. Patients who underwent surgical correction had the diaphragmatic defect size graded (A-D) using a standardized system. Other data known to affect outcome were combined to create a usable staging system. The primary outcome was death or hospital discharge. Results: A total of 1,975 infants were evaluated. A total of 326 infants were not repaired, and all died. Of the remaining 1,649, the defect was scored in 1,638 patients. A small defect (A) had a high survival, while a large defect was much worse. Cardiac defects significantly worsened outcome. We grouped patients into 6 categories based on defect size with an isolated A defect as stage I. A major cardiac anomaly (+) placed the patient in the next higher stage. Applying this, patient survival is 99% for stage I, 96% stage II, 78% stage III, 58% stage IV, 39% stage V, and 0% for non-repair. Conclusions: The size of the diaphragmatic defect and a severe cardiac anomaly are strongly associated with outcome. Standardizing reporting is imperative in determining optimal outcomes and effective therapies for CDH and could serve as a benchmark for prospective trials.

AB - Background/purpose: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) remains a significant cause of neonatal death. A wide spectrum of disease severity and treatment strategies makes comparisons challenging. The objective of this study was to create a standardized reporting system for CDH. Methods: Data were prospectively collected on all live born infants with CDH from 51 centers in 9 countries. Patients who underwent surgical correction had the diaphragmatic defect size graded (A-D) using a standardized system. Other data known to affect outcome were combined to create a usable staging system. The primary outcome was death or hospital discharge. Results: A total of 1,975 infants were evaluated. A total of 326 infants were not repaired, and all died. Of the remaining 1,649, the defect was scored in 1,638 patients. A small defect (A) had a high survival, while a large defect was much worse. Cardiac defects significantly worsened outcome. We grouped patients into 6 categories based on defect size with an isolated A defect as stage I. A major cardiac anomaly (+) placed the patient in the next higher stage. Applying this, patient survival is 99% for stage I, 96% stage II, 78% stage III, 58% stage IV, 39% stage V, and 0% for non-repair. Conclusions: The size of the diaphragmatic defect and a severe cardiac anomaly are strongly associated with outcome. Standardizing reporting is imperative in determining optimal outcomes and effective therapies for CDH and could serve as a benchmark for prospective trials.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889599932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889599932&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.08.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.08.014

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 2408

EP - 2415

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

IS - 12

ER -