Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap

The Beauty of the Buttock

Cedric Hunter, Lisa Moody, Anna Luan, Rahim Nazerali, Gordon K. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap is a useful technique for breast reconstruction. This perforator flap allows for the transfer of the patient's own skin and subcutaneous tissue with minimal donor-site morbidity. Despite its usefulness, the SGAP flap is not widely used among reconstructive surgeons. The challenging perforator dissection and need for microsurgery may contribute to the reluctant use of the flap by many reconstructive surgeons. The ability to perform a single-stage breast reconstruction with buttock tissue when abdominal or thigh tissue are unavailable provides a significant service to the patient desiring an autologous breast reconstruction.

METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review and outcomes analysis of a single surgeon's surgical technique and experience. Consecutive patients, who underwent SGAP flaps for breast reconstruction during a 7-year period from 2007 to 2014, were compared to a matched cohort of consecutive patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS: Thirteen patients underwent SGAP flap breast reconstruction for a total of 16 flaps during the study period compared to 34 consecutive DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. There was no significant difference in flap or donor-site complications between the 2 groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the average operative time for unilateral breast reconstruction in the SGAP and DIEP flap groups. In 4 patients, a bipedicled SGAP flap was used due to perforator anatomy. All SGAP patients returned to full activity. Average follow-up time was 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS: Although utilization of buttock tissue for breast reconstruction can be challenging and requires microsurgical expertise, in the hands of experienced microsurgeons the SGAP flap is a safe and reliable option for autologous breast reconstruction with minimal donor-site morbidity and excellent aesthetic results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S191-S195
JournalAnnals of plastic surgery
Volume76
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Perforator Flap
Beauty
Buttocks
Mammaplasty
Arteries
Tissue Donors
Morbidity
Patient Transfer
Aptitude
Microsurgery
Subcutaneous Tissue
Operative Time
Thigh
Esthetics
Dissection
Anatomy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap : The Beauty of the Buttock. / Hunter, Cedric; Moody, Lisa; Luan, Anna; Nazerali, Rahim; Lee, Gordon K.

In: Annals of plastic surgery, Vol. 76, 01.05.2016, p. S191-S195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hunter, Cedric ; Moody, Lisa ; Luan, Anna ; Nazerali, Rahim ; Lee, Gordon K. / Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap : The Beauty of the Buttock. In: Annals of plastic surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 76. pp. S191-S195.
@article{e515bdcd193b4d45811545bb4dce796d,
title = "Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap: The Beauty of the Buttock",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap is a useful technique for breast reconstruction. This perforator flap allows for the transfer of the patient's own skin and subcutaneous tissue with minimal donor-site morbidity. Despite its usefulness, the SGAP flap is not widely used among reconstructive surgeons. The challenging perforator dissection and need for microsurgery may contribute to the reluctant use of the flap by many reconstructive surgeons. The ability to perform a single-stage breast reconstruction with buttock tissue when abdominal or thigh tissue are unavailable provides a significant service to the patient desiring an autologous breast reconstruction.METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review and outcomes analysis of a single surgeon's surgical technique and experience. Consecutive patients, who underwent SGAP flaps for breast reconstruction during a 7-year period from 2007 to 2014, were compared to a matched cohort of consecutive patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps and clinical outcomes were analyzed.RESULTS: Thirteen patients underwent SGAP flap breast reconstruction for a total of 16 flaps during the study period compared to 34 consecutive DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. There was no significant difference in flap or donor-site complications between the 2 groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the average operative time for unilateral breast reconstruction in the SGAP and DIEP flap groups. In 4 patients, a bipedicled SGAP flap was used due to perforator anatomy. All SGAP patients returned to full activity. Average follow-up time was 1 year.CONCLUSIONS: Although utilization of buttock tissue for breast reconstruction can be challenging and requires microsurgical expertise, in the hands of experienced microsurgeons the SGAP flap is a safe and reliable option for autologous breast reconstruction with minimal donor-site morbidity and excellent aesthetic results.",
author = "Cedric Hunter and Lisa Moody and Anna Luan and Rahim Nazerali and Lee, {Gordon K.}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SAP.0000000000000723",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "S191--S195",
journal = "Annals of Plastic Surgery",
issn = "0148-7043",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap

T2 - The Beauty of the Buttock

AU - Hunter, Cedric

AU - Moody, Lisa

AU - Luan, Anna

AU - Nazerali, Rahim

AU - Lee, Gordon K.

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap is a useful technique for breast reconstruction. This perforator flap allows for the transfer of the patient's own skin and subcutaneous tissue with minimal donor-site morbidity. Despite its usefulness, the SGAP flap is not widely used among reconstructive surgeons. The challenging perforator dissection and need for microsurgery may contribute to the reluctant use of the flap by many reconstructive surgeons. The ability to perform a single-stage breast reconstruction with buttock tissue when abdominal or thigh tissue are unavailable provides a significant service to the patient desiring an autologous breast reconstruction.METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review and outcomes analysis of a single surgeon's surgical technique and experience. Consecutive patients, who underwent SGAP flaps for breast reconstruction during a 7-year period from 2007 to 2014, were compared to a matched cohort of consecutive patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps and clinical outcomes were analyzed.RESULTS: Thirteen patients underwent SGAP flap breast reconstruction for a total of 16 flaps during the study period compared to 34 consecutive DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. There was no significant difference in flap or donor-site complications between the 2 groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the average operative time for unilateral breast reconstruction in the SGAP and DIEP flap groups. In 4 patients, a bipedicled SGAP flap was used due to perforator anatomy. All SGAP patients returned to full activity. Average follow-up time was 1 year.CONCLUSIONS: Although utilization of buttock tissue for breast reconstruction can be challenging and requires microsurgical expertise, in the hands of experienced microsurgeons the SGAP flap is a safe and reliable option for autologous breast reconstruction with minimal donor-site morbidity and excellent aesthetic results.

AB - BACKGROUND: The superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap is a useful technique for breast reconstruction. This perforator flap allows for the transfer of the patient's own skin and subcutaneous tissue with minimal donor-site morbidity. Despite its usefulness, the SGAP flap is not widely used among reconstructive surgeons. The challenging perforator dissection and need for microsurgery may contribute to the reluctant use of the flap by many reconstructive surgeons. The ability to perform a single-stage breast reconstruction with buttock tissue when abdominal or thigh tissue are unavailable provides a significant service to the patient desiring an autologous breast reconstruction.METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review and outcomes analysis of a single surgeon's surgical technique and experience. Consecutive patients, who underwent SGAP flaps for breast reconstruction during a 7-year period from 2007 to 2014, were compared to a matched cohort of consecutive patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps and clinical outcomes were analyzed.RESULTS: Thirteen patients underwent SGAP flap breast reconstruction for a total of 16 flaps during the study period compared to 34 consecutive DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. There was no significant difference in flap or donor-site complications between the 2 groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the average operative time for unilateral breast reconstruction in the SGAP and DIEP flap groups. In 4 patients, a bipedicled SGAP flap was used due to perforator anatomy. All SGAP patients returned to full activity. Average follow-up time was 1 year.CONCLUSIONS: Although utilization of buttock tissue for breast reconstruction can be challenging and requires microsurgical expertise, in the hands of experienced microsurgeons the SGAP flap is a safe and reliable option for autologous breast reconstruction with minimal donor-site morbidity and excellent aesthetic results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955574498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955574498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000723

DO - 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000723

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - S191-S195

JO - Annals of Plastic Surgery

JF - Annals of Plastic Surgery

SN - 0148-7043

ER -