The diagnosis of food allergy

Jay Lieberman, Scott H. Sicherer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Food allergy is increasingly common; however, there is a discrepancy between the large number of people who believe they or their children are affected and the actual number with true food allergies. It is therefore imperative that physicians evaluating patients with possible adverse reactions to foods understand the current modalities used to diagnose food allergies. Methods: Simple tests including skin-prick testing (SPT) and serum food-specific IgE testing are the most commonly used diagnostic tests to evaluate for IgE-mediated food reactions. However, these tests have pitfalls and their usefulness must be appreciated to avoid over- and underdiagnosis. Results: A firm diagnosis is imperative because a misdiagnosis could lead to life-threatening reactions and overdiagnosis will lead to unnecessary elimination diets with nutritional and social implications. Physician-supervised oral food challenges (OFC) remain the gold standard for food allergy diagnosis; however, a careful medical history and simple tests can often provide a reliable diagnosis. Conclusion: In this review, we examine the usefulness and pitfalls of SPT used by allergists and serum food-specific IgE levels that are available to all practitioners. We also review the OFC as a diagnostic modality in food allergy. Finally, we describe emerging tests, such as the basophil activation test, atopy patch testing, and component-resolved diagnostics, that may be of benefit in the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)439-443
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Rhinology and Allergy
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Food Hypersensitivity
Food
Immunoglobulin E
Physicians
Patch Tests
Basophils
Skin Tests
Diagnostic Errors
Serum
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Diet
Skin

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

The diagnosis of food allergy. / Lieberman, Jay; Sicherer, Scott H.

In: American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy, Vol. 24, No. 6, 01.11.2010, p. 439-443.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Lieberman, Jay ; Sicherer, Scott H. / The diagnosis of food allergy. In: American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy. 2010 ; Vol. 24, No. 6. pp. 439-443.
@article{bdb5af21f6354ee2a222f27db11a2ca7,
title = "The diagnosis of food allergy",
abstract = "Background: Food allergy is increasingly common; however, there is a discrepancy between the large number of people who believe they or their children are affected and the actual number with true food allergies. It is therefore imperative that physicians evaluating patients with possible adverse reactions to foods understand the current modalities used to diagnose food allergies. Methods: Simple tests including skin-prick testing (SPT) and serum food-specific IgE testing are the most commonly used diagnostic tests to evaluate for IgE-mediated food reactions. However, these tests have pitfalls and their usefulness must be appreciated to avoid over- and underdiagnosis. Results: A firm diagnosis is imperative because a misdiagnosis could lead to life-threatening reactions and overdiagnosis will lead to unnecessary elimination diets with nutritional and social implications. Physician-supervised oral food challenges (OFC) remain the gold standard for food allergy diagnosis; however, a careful medical history and simple tests can often provide a reliable diagnosis. Conclusion: In this review, we examine the usefulness and pitfalls of SPT used by allergists and serum food-specific IgE levels that are available to all practitioners. We also review the OFC as a diagnostic modality in food allergy. Finally, we describe emerging tests, such as the basophil activation test, atopy patch testing, and component-resolved diagnostics, that may be of benefit in the future.",
author = "Jay Lieberman and Sicherer, {Scott H.}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3515",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "439--443",
journal = "American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy",
issn = "1945-8924",
publisher = "OceanSide Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The diagnosis of food allergy

AU - Lieberman, Jay

AU - Sicherer, Scott H.

PY - 2010/11/1

Y1 - 2010/11/1

N2 - Background: Food allergy is increasingly common; however, there is a discrepancy between the large number of people who believe they or their children are affected and the actual number with true food allergies. It is therefore imperative that physicians evaluating patients with possible adverse reactions to foods understand the current modalities used to diagnose food allergies. Methods: Simple tests including skin-prick testing (SPT) and serum food-specific IgE testing are the most commonly used diagnostic tests to evaluate for IgE-mediated food reactions. However, these tests have pitfalls and their usefulness must be appreciated to avoid over- and underdiagnosis. Results: A firm diagnosis is imperative because a misdiagnosis could lead to life-threatening reactions and overdiagnosis will lead to unnecessary elimination diets with nutritional and social implications. Physician-supervised oral food challenges (OFC) remain the gold standard for food allergy diagnosis; however, a careful medical history and simple tests can often provide a reliable diagnosis. Conclusion: In this review, we examine the usefulness and pitfalls of SPT used by allergists and serum food-specific IgE levels that are available to all practitioners. We also review the OFC as a diagnostic modality in food allergy. Finally, we describe emerging tests, such as the basophil activation test, atopy patch testing, and component-resolved diagnostics, that may be of benefit in the future.

AB - Background: Food allergy is increasingly common; however, there is a discrepancy between the large number of people who believe they or their children are affected and the actual number with true food allergies. It is therefore imperative that physicians evaluating patients with possible adverse reactions to foods understand the current modalities used to diagnose food allergies. Methods: Simple tests including skin-prick testing (SPT) and serum food-specific IgE testing are the most commonly used diagnostic tests to evaluate for IgE-mediated food reactions. However, these tests have pitfalls and their usefulness must be appreciated to avoid over- and underdiagnosis. Results: A firm diagnosis is imperative because a misdiagnosis could lead to life-threatening reactions and overdiagnosis will lead to unnecessary elimination diets with nutritional and social implications. Physician-supervised oral food challenges (OFC) remain the gold standard for food allergy diagnosis; however, a careful medical history and simple tests can often provide a reliable diagnosis. Conclusion: In this review, we examine the usefulness and pitfalls of SPT used by allergists and serum food-specific IgE levels that are available to all practitioners. We also review the OFC as a diagnostic modality in food allergy. Finally, we describe emerging tests, such as the basophil activation test, atopy patch testing, and component-resolved diagnostics, that may be of benefit in the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649936732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649936732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3515

DO - 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3515

M3 - Review article

C2 - 21144222

AN - SCOPUS:78649936732

VL - 24

SP - 439

EP - 443

JO - American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy

JF - American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy

SN - 1945-8924

IS - 6

ER -