The impact of sociodemographic factors and PSA screening among low-income Black and White men: Data from the Southern Community Cohort Study

K. A. Moses, Z. Zhao, Y. Bi, J. Acquaye, A. Holmes, W. J. Blot, J. H. Fowke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background:Variation in PSA screening is a potential source of disparity in prostate cancer survival, particularly among underserved populations. We sought to examine the impact of race and socioeconomic status (SES) on receipt of PSA testing among low-income men.Methods:Black (n=22 167) and White (n=9588) men aged 3/440 years completed a baseline questionnaire from 2002 to 2009 as part of the Southern Community Cohort Study. Men reported whether they had ever received PSA testing and had testing within the prior 12 months. To evaluate the associations between SES, race and receipt of PSA testing, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from the multivariable logistic models where age, household income, insurance status, marital status, body mass index and educational level were adjusted.Results:Black men were younger, had a lower income, less attained education and were more likely to be unmarried and uninsured (all P<0.001). Percentages of men having ever received PSA testing rose from <40% under the age of 45 years to ∼90% above the age of 65 years, with Whites >50 more likely than Blacks to have received testing. Lower SES was significantly associated with less receipt of PSA testing in both groups. After adjustment for SES, White men had significantly lower odds of PSA testing (OR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.76-0.87).Conclusions:Greater PSA testing among White than Black men over the age of 50 years in this low-income population appears to be mainly a consequence of SES. Strategies for PSA screening may benefit from tailoring to the social circumstances of the men being screened.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)424-429
Number of pages6
JournalProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

Cohort Studies
Social Class
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Insurance Coverage
Marital Status
Vulnerable Populations
Poverty
hydroquinone
Prostatic Neoplasms
Body Mass Index
Logistic Models
Education
Survival

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Urology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

The impact of sociodemographic factors and PSA screening among low-income Black and White men : Data from the Southern Community Cohort Study. / Moses, K. A.; Zhao, Z.; Bi, Y.; Acquaye, J.; Holmes, A.; Blot, W. J.; Fowke, J. H.

In: Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, Vol. 20, No. 4, 01.12.2017, p. 424-429.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{027f2be5761c48e8b99d34da2e2f8dac,
title = "The impact of sociodemographic factors and PSA screening among low-income Black and White men: Data from the Southern Community Cohort Study",
abstract = "Background:Variation in PSA screening is a potential source of disparity in prostate cancer survival, particularly among underserved populations. We sought to examine the impact of race and socioeconomic status (SES) on receipt of PSA testing among low-income men.Methods:Black (n=22 167) and White (n=9588) men aged 3/440 years completed a baseline questionnaire from 2002 to 2009 as part of the Southern Community Cohort Study. Men reported whether they had ever received PSA testing and had testing within the prior 12 months. To evaluate the associations between SES, race and receipt of PSA testing, odds ratios (ORs) and 95{\%} confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from the multivariable logistic models where age, household income, insurance status, marital status, body mass index and educational level were adjusted.Results:Black men were younger, had a lower income, less attained education and were more likely to be unmarried and uninsured (all P<0.001). Percentages of men having ever received PSA testing rose from <40{\%} under the age of 45 years to ∼90{\%} above the age of 65 years, with Whites >50 more likely than Blacks to have received testing. Lower SES was significantly associated with less receipt of PSA testing in both groups. After adjustment for SES, White men had significantly lower odds of PSA testing (OR 0.81; 95{\%} CI: 0.76-0.87).Conclusions:Greater PSA testing among White than Black men over the age of 50 years in this low-income population appears to be mainly a consequence of SES. Strategies for PSA screening may benefit from tailoring to the social circumstances of the men being screened.",
author = "Moses, {K. A.} and Z. Zhao and Y. Bi and J. Acquaye and A. Holmes and Blot, {W. J.} and Fowke, {J. H.}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/pcan.2017.32",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "424--429",
journal = "Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases",
issn = "1365-7852",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of sociodemographic factors and PSA screening among low-income Black and White men

T2 - Data from the Southern Community Cohort Study

AU - Moses, K. A.

AU - Zhao, Z.

AU - Bi, Y.

AU - Acquaye, J.

AU - Holmes, A.

AU - Blot, W. J.

AU - Fowke, J. H.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Background:Variation in PSA screening is a potential source of disparity in prostate cancer survival, particularly among underserved populations. We sought to examine the impact of race and socioeconomic status (SES) on receipt of PSA testing among low-income men.Methods:Black (n=22 167) and White (n=9588) men aged 3/440 years completed a baseline questionnaire from 2002 to 2009 as part of the Southern Community Cohort Study. Men reported whether they had ever received PSA testing and had testing within the prior 12 months. To evaluate the associations between SES, race and receipt of PSA testing, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from the multivariable logistic models where age, household income, insurance status, marital status, body mass index and educational level were adjusted.Results:Black men were younger, had a lower income, less attained education and were more likely to be unmarried and uninsured (all P<0.001). Percentages of men having ever received PSA testing rose from <40% under the age of 45 years to ∼90% above the age of 65 years, with Whites >50 more likely than Blacks to have received testing. Lower SES was significantly associated with less receipt of PSA testing in both groups. After adjustment for SES, White men had significantly lower odds of PSA testing (OR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.76-0.87).Conclusions:Greater PSA testing among White than Black men over the age of 50 years in this low-income population appears to be mainly a consequence of SES. Strategies for PSA screening may benefit from tailoring to the social circumstances of the men being screened.

AB - Background:Variation in PSA screening is a potential source of disparity in prostate cancer survival, particularly among underserved populations. We sought to examine the impact of race and socioeconomic status (SES) on receipt of PSA testing among low-income men.Methods:Black (n=22 167) and White (n=9588) men aged 3/440 years completed a baseline questionnaire from 2002 to 2009 as part of the Southern Community Cohort Study. Men reported whether they had ever received PSA testing and had testing within the prior 12 months. To evaluate the associations between SES, race and receipt of PSA testing, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from the multivariable logistic models where age, household income, insurance status, marital status, body mass index and educational level were adjusted.Results:Black men were younger, had a lower income, less attained education and were more likely to be unmarried and uninsured (all P<0.001). Percentages of men having ever received PSA testing rose from <40% under the age of 45 years to ∼90% above the age of 65 years, with Whites >50 more likely than Blacks to have received testing. Lower SES was significantly associated with less receipt of PSA testing in both groups. After adjustment for SES, White men had significantly lower odds of PSA testing (OR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.76-0.87).Conclusions:Greater PSA testing among White than Black men over the age of 50 years in this low-income population appears to be mainly a consequence of SES. Strategies for PSA screening may benefit from tailoring to the social circumstances of the men being screened.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033704696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033704696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/pcan.2017.32

DO - 10.1038/pcan.2017.32

M3 - Article

C2 - 28695916

AN - SCOPUS:85033704696

VL - 20

SP - 424

EP - 429

JO - Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases

JF - Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases

SN - 1365-7852

IS - 4

ER -