The new metric to define large-volume hemorrhage

Results of a prospective study of the critical administration threshold

Stephanie A. Savage, Joshua J. Sumislawsk, Ben L. Zarzaur, Wesley P. Dutton, Martin Croce, Timothy Fabian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Definitions of massive transfusion (MT), 10 or more units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) in 24 hours, focus on static volumes over fixed times. This arbitrary volume definition promotes survivor bias and fails to identify the "massively" transfused patient. In previous work, the critical administration threshold (CAT) was created to incorporate both rate and volume of transfusion. CAT proved a superior predictor of mortality compared with traditional MT. The purpose of this study was to prospectively validate CAT in a larger trauma population. Methods: Patients receiving at least 1 U of PRBCs within the first day of admission were identified prospectively. Administration time of each unit of PRBCs was recorded in minutes. CAT status, defined as receipt of at least 3 U of blood in a 60-minute period, was identified for the first 24 hours. CAT+ patientswere quantified by the number of times CAT+ was reached, that is, once (CAT1), twice (CAT2), three times (CAT3), or 4 or more times (CAT4). A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model with a timevarying covariate was used to quantify a patient's risk of death with increasing CAT status. Results: A total of 316 met inclusion criteria, 161 of whom were CAT+. Seventy-six percent were male, mean age was 38 years, and median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 15. CAT+ was associated with a twofold increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.809; 95% confidence interval, 1.020-3.209). Ninety-one patients were CAT+ and received less than 10 U of blood, thereby MT- (CAT+/MT-). CAT+/MT- had significant injury patterns, with a median ISS of 14, 43% penetrating injury, and 10% mortality. Conclusion: CAT allows early identification of injured patients at greatest risk of death. Encompassing both rate and volume of transfusion, CAT is a tool more sensitive than common MT definitions. Studies examining large-volume blood transfusions should use CAT to identify patients, to accurately identify cohorts of interest. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic tests, level II.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)224-230
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume78
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

Prospective Studies
Hemorrhage
Injury Severity Score
Erythrocytes
Wounds and Injuries
Mortality
Proportional Hazards Models
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Blood Transfusion
Survivors
Confidence Intervals
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

The new metric to define large-volume hemorrhage : Results of a prospective study of the critical administration threshold. / Savage, Stephanie A.; Sumislawsk, Joshua J.; Zarzaur, Ben L.; Dutton, Wesley P.; Croce, Martin; Fabian, Timothy.

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vol. 78, No. 2, 01.02.2015, p. 224-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Savage, Stephanie A. ; Sumislawsk, Joshua J. ; Zarzaur, Ben L. ; Dutton, Wesley P. ; Croce, Martin ; Fabian, Timothy. / The new metric to define large-volume hemorrhage : Results of a prospective study of the critical administration threshold. In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 78, No. 2. pp. 224-230.
@article{39919f8c822745f190e422f97622cc8c,
title = "The new metric to define large-volume hemorrhage: Results of a prospective study of the critical administration threshold",
abstract = "Background: Definitions of massive transfusion (MT), 10 or more units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) in 24 hours, focus on static volumes over fixed times. This arbitrary volume definition promotes survivor bias and fails to identify the {"}massively{"} transfused patient. In previous work, the critical administration threshold (CAT) was created to incorporate both rate and volume of transfusion. CAT proved a superior predictor of mortality compared with traditional MT. The purpose of this study was to prospectively validate CAT in a larger trauma population. Methods: Patients receiving at least 1 U of PRBCs within the first day of admission were identified prospectively. Administration time of each unit of PRBCs was recorded in minutes. CAT status, defined as receipt of at least 3 U of blood in a 60-minute period, was identified for the first 24 hours. CAT+ patientswere quantified by the number of times CAT+ was reached, that is, once (CAT1), twice (CAT2), three times (CAT3), or 4 or more times (CAT4). A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model with a timevarying covariate was used to quantify a patient's risk of death with increasing CAT status. Results: A total of 316 met inclusion criteria, 161 of whom were CAT+. Seventy-six percent were male, mean age was 38 years, and median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 15. CAT+ was associated with a twofold increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.809; 95{\%} confidence interval, 1.020-3.209). Ninety-one patients were CAT+ and received less than 10 U of blood, thereby MT- (CAT+/MT-). CAT+/MT- had significant injury patterns, with a median ISS of 14, 43{\%} penetrating injury, and 10{\%} mortality. Conclusion: CAT allows early identification of injured patients at greatest risk of death. Encompassing both rate and volume of transfusion, CAT is a tool more sensitive than common MT definitions. Studies examining large-volume blood transfusions should use CAT to identify patients, to accurately identify cohorts of interest. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic tests, level II.",
author = "Savage, {Stephanie A.} and Sumislawsk, {Joshua J.} and Zarzaur, {Ben L.} and Dutton, {Wesley P.} and Martin Croce and Timothy Fabian",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0000000000000502",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "224--230",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The new metric to define large-volume hemorrhage

T2 - Results of a prospective study of the critical administration threshold

AU - Savage, Stephanie A.

AU - Sumislawsk, Joshua J.

AU - Zarzaur, Ben L.

AU - Dutton, Wesley P.

AU - Croce, Martin

AU - Fabian, Timothy

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Background: Definitions of massive transfusion (MT), 10 or more units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) in 24 hours, focus on static volumes over fixed times. This arbitrary volume definition promotes survivor bias and fails to identify the "massively" transfused patient. In previous work, the critical administration threshold (CAT) was created to incorporate both rate and volume of transfusion. CAT proved a superior predictor of mortality compared with traditional MT. The purpose of this study was to prospectively validate CAT in a larger trauma population. Methods: Patients receiving at least 1 U of PRBCs within the first day of admission were identified prospectively. Administration time of each unit of PRBCs was recorded in minutes. CAT status, defined as receipt of at least 3 U of blood in a 60-minute period, was identified for the first 24 hours. CAT+ patientswere quantified by the number of times CAT+ was reached, that is, once (CAT1), twice (CAT2), three times (CAT3), or 4 or more times (CAT4). A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model with a timevarying covariate was used to quantify a patient's risk of death with increasing CAT status. Results: A total of 316 met inclusion criteria, 161 of whom were CAT+. Seventy-six percent were male, mean age was 38 years, and median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 15. CAT+ was associated with a twofold increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.809; 95% confidence interval, 1.020-3.209). Ninety-one patients were CAT+ and received less than 10 U of blood, thereby MT- (CAT+/MT-). CAT+/MT- had significant injury patterns, with a median ISS of 14, 43% penetrating injury, and 10% mortality. Conclusion: CAT allows early identification of injured patients at greatest risk of death. Encompassing both rate and volume of transfusion, CAT is a tool more sensitive than common MT definitions. Studies examining large-volume blood transfusions should use CAT to identify patients, to accurately identify cohorts of interest. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic tests, level II.

AB - Background: Definitions of massive transfusion (MT), 10 or more units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) in 24 hours, focus on static volumes over fixed times. This arbitrary volume definition promotes survivor bias and fails to identify the "massively" transfused patient. In previous work, the critical administration threshold (CAT) was created to incorporate both rate and volume of transfusion. CAT proved a superior predictor of mortality compared with traditional MT. The purpose of this study was to prospectively validate CAT in a larger trauma population. Methods: Patients receiving at least 1 U of PRBCs within the first day of admission were identified prospectively. Administration time of each unit of PRBCs was recorded in minutes. CAT status, defined as receipt of at least 3 U of blood in a 60-minute period, was identified for the first 24 hours. CAT+ patientswere quantified by the number of times CAT+ was reached, that is, once (CAT1), twice (CAT2), three times (CAT3), or 4 or more times (CAT4). A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model with a timevarying covariate was used to quantify a patient's risk of death with increasing CAT status. Results: A total of 316 met inclusion criteria, 161 of whom were CAT+. Seventy-six percent were male, mean age was 38 years, and median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 15. CAT+ was associated with a twofold increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.809; 95% confidence interval, 1.020-3.209). Ninety-one patients were CAT+ and received less than 10 U of blood, thereby MT- (CAT+/MT-). CAT+/MT- had significant injury patterns, with a median ISS of 14, 43% penetrating injury, and 10% mortality. Conclusion: CAT allows early identification of injured patients at greatest risk of death. Encompassing both rate and volume of transfusion, CAT is a tool more sensitive than common MT definitions. Studies examining large-volume blood transfusions should use CAT to identify patients, to accurately identify cohorts of interest. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic tests, level II.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925874320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925874320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000000502

DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000000502

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 224

EP - 230

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 2

ER -