Three-dimensional fusion computed tomography decreases radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast use during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair

Michael Mcnally, Salvatore T. Scali, Robert J. Feezor, Daniel Neal, Thomas S. Huber, Adam W. Beck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective Endovascular surgery has revolutionized the treatment of aortic aneurysms; however, these improvements have come at the cost of increased radiation and contrast exposure, particularly for more complex procedures. Three-dimensional (3D) fusion computed tomography (CT) imaging is a new technology that may facilitate these repairs. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the effect of using intraoperative 3D fusion CT on the performance of fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR). Methods Our institutional database was reviewed to identify patients undergoing branched or FEVAR. Patients treated using 3D fusion CT were compared with patients treated in the immediate 12-month period before implementation of this technology when procedures were performed in a standard hybrid operating room without CT fusion capabilities. Primary end points included patient radiation exposure (cumulated air kerma: mGy), fluoroscopy time (minutes), contrast usage (mL), and procedure time (minutes). Patients were grouped by the number of aortic graft fenestrations revascularized with a stent graft, and operative outcomes were compared. Results A total of 72 patients (41 before vs 31 after 3D fusion CT implementation) underwent FEVAR from September 2012 through March 2014. For two-vessel fenestrated endografts, there was a significant decrease in radiation exposure (3400 ± 1900 vs 1380 ± 520 mGy; P =.001), fluoroscopy time (63 ± 29 vs 41 ± 11 minutes; P =.02), and contrast usage (69 ± 16 vs 26 ± 8 mL; P =.0002) with intraoperative 3D fusion CT. Similarly, for combined three-vessel and four-vessel FEVAR, significantly decreased radiation exposure (5400 ± 2225 vs 2700 ± 1400 mGy; P <.0001), fluoroscopy time (89 ± 36 vs 64 ± 21 minutes; P =.02), contrast usage (90 ± 25 vs 39 ± 17 mL; P <.0001), and procedure time (330 ± 100 vs 230 ± 50 minutes; P =.002) was noted. Estimated blood loss was significantly less (P <.0001), and length of stay had a trend (P =.07) toward being lower for all patients in the 3D fusion CT group. Conclusions These results demonstrate that use of intraoperative 3D fusion CT imaging during FEVAR can significantly decrease radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast usage, which may also decrease the overall physiologic impact of the repair.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309-316
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume61
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tomography
Fluoroscopy
Technology
Transplants
Radiation Exposure
Aortic Aneurysm
Operating Rooms
Stents
Length of Stay
Air
Databases

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Three-dimensional fusion computed tomography decreases radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast use during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. / Mcnally, Michael; Scali, Salvatore T.; Feezor, Robert J.; Neal, Daniel; Huber, Thomas S.; Beck, Adam W.

In: Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 61, No. 2, 01.02.2015, p. 309-316.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mcnally, Michael ; Scali, Salvatore T. ; Feezor, Robert J. ; Neal, Daniel ; Huber, Thomas S. ; Beck, Adam W. / Three-dimensional fusion computed tomography decreases radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast use during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. In: Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 61, No. 2. pp. 309-316.
@article{ea8b7eb162e84013b1a568cc68ac49f7,
title = "Three-dimensional fusion computed tomography decreases radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast use during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair",
abstract = "Objective Endovascular surgery has revolutionized the treatment of aortic aneurysms; however, these improvements have come at the cost of increased radiation and contrast exposure, particularly for more complex procedures. Three-dimensional (3D) fusion computed tomography (CT) imaging is a new technology that may facilitate these repairs. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the effect of using intraoperative 3D fusion CT on the performance of fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR). Methods Our institutional database was reviewed to identify patients undergoing branched or FEVAR. Patients treated using 3D fusion CT were compared with patients treated in the immediate 12-month period before implementation of this technology when procedures were performed in a standard hybrid operating room without CT fusion capabilities. Primary end points included patient radiation exposure (cumulated air kerma: mGy), fluoroscopy time (minutes), contrast usage (mL), and procedure time (minutes). Patients were grouped by the number of aortic graft fenestrations revascularized with a stent graft, and operative outcomes were compared. Results A total of 72 patients (41 before vs 31 after 3D fusion CT implementation) underwent FEVAR from September 2012 through March 2014. For two-vessel fenestrated endografts, there was a significant decrease in radiation exposure (3400 ± 1900 vs 1380 ± 520 mGy; P =.001), fluoroscopy time (63 ± 29 vs 41 ± 11 minutes; P =.02), and contrast usage (69 ± 16 vs 26 ± 8 mL; P =.0002) with intraoperative 3D fusion CT. Similarly, for combined three-vessel and four-vessel FEVAR, significantly decreased radiation exposure (5400 ± 2225 vs 2700 ± 1400 mGy; P <.0001), fluoroscopy time (89 ± 36 vs 64 ± 21 minutes; P =.02), contrast usage (90 ± 25 vs 39 ± 17 mL; P <.0001), and procedure time (330 ± 100 vs 230 ± 50 minutes; P =.002) was noted. Estimated blood loss was significantly less (P <.0001), and length of stay had a trend (P =.07) toward being lower for all patients in the 3D fusion CT group. Conclusions These results demonstrate that use of intraoperative 3D fusion CT imaging during FEVAR can significantly decrease radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast usage, which may also decrease the overall physiologic impact of the repair.",
author = "Michael Mcnally and Scali, {Salvatore T.} and Feezor, {Robert J.} and Daniel Neal and Huber, {Thomas S.} and Beck, {Adam W.}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jvs.2014.07.097",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "309--316",
journal = "Journal of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0741-5214",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three-dimensional fusion computed tomography decreases radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast use during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair

AU - Mcnally, Michael

AU - Scali, Salvatore T.

AU - Feezor, Robert J.

AU - Neal, Daniel

AU - Huber, Thomas S.

AU - Beck, Adam W.

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Objective Endovascular surgery has revolutionized the treatment of aortic aneurysms; however, these improvements have come at the cost of increased radiation and contrast exposure, particularly for more complex procedures. Three-dimensional (3D) fusion computed tomography (CT) imaging is a new technology that may facilitate these repairs. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the effect of using intraoperative 3D fusion CT on the performance of fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR). Methods Our institutional database was reviewed to identify patients undergoing branched or FEVAR. Patients treated using 3D fusion CT were compared with patients treated in the immediate 12-month period before implementation of this technology when procedures were performed in a standard hybrid operating room without CT fusion capabilities. Primary end points included patient radiation exposure (cumulated air kerma: mGy), fluoroscopy time (minutes), contrast usage (mL), and procedure time (minutes). Patients were grouped by the number of aortic graft fenestrations revascularized with a stent graft, and operative outcomes were compared. Results A total of 72 patients (41 before vs 31 after 3D fusion CT implementation) underwent FEVAR from September 2012 through March 2014. For two-vessel fenestrated endografts, there was a significant decrease in radiation exposure (3400 ± 1900 vs 1380 ± 520 mGy; P =.001), fluoroscopy time (63 ± 29 vs 41 ± 11 minutes; P =.02), and contrast usage (69 ± 16 vs 26 ± 8 mL; P =.0002) with intraoperative 3D fusion CT. Similarly, for combined three-vessel and four-vessel FEVAR, significantly decreased radiation exposure (5400 ± 2225 vs 2700 ± 1400 mGy; P <.0001), fluoroscopy time (89 ± 36 vs 64 ± 21 minutes; P =.02), contrast usage (90 ± 25 vs 39 ± 17 mL; P <.0001), and procedure time (330 ± 100 vs 230 ± 50 minutes; P =.002) was noted. Estimated blood loss was significantly less (P <.0001), and length of stay had a trend (P =.07) toward being lower for all patients in the 3D fusion CT group. Conclusions These results demonstrate that use of intraoperative 3D fusion CT imaging during FEVAR can significantly decrease radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast usage, which may also decrease the overall physiologic impact of the repair.

AB - Objective Endovascular surgery has revolutionized the treatment of aortic aneurysms; however, these improvements have come at the cost of increased radiation and contrast exposure, particularly for more complex procedures. Three-dimensional (3D) fusion computed tomography (CT) imaging is a new technology that may facilitate these repairs. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the effect of using intraoperative 3D fusion CT on the performance of fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR). Methods Our institutional database was reviewed to identify patients undergoing branched or FEVAR. Patients treated using 3D fusion CT were compared with patients treated in the immediate 12-month period before implementation of this technology when procedures were performed in a standard hybrid operating room without CT fusion capabilities. Primary end points included patient radiation exposure (cumulated air kerma: mGy), fluoroscopy time (minutes), contrast usage (mL), and procedure time (minutes). Patients were grouped by the number of aortic graft fenestrations revascularized with a stent graft, and operative outcomes were compared. Results A total of 72 patients (41 before vs 31 after 3D fusion CT implementation) underwent FEVAR from September 2012 through March 2014. For two-vessel fenestrated endografts, there was a significant decrease in radiation exposure (3400 ± 1900 vs 1380 ± 520 mGy; P =.001), fluoroscopy time (63 ± 29 vs 41 ± 11 minutes; P =.02), and contrast usage (69 ± 16 vs 26 ± 8 mL; P =.0002) with intraoperative 3D fusion CT. Similarly, for combined three-vessel and four-vessel FEVAR, significantly decreased radiation exposure (5400 ± 2225 vs 2700 ± 1400 mGy; P <.0001), fluoroscopy time (89 ± 36 vs 64 ± 21 minutes; P =.02), contrast usage (90 ± 25 vs 39 ± 17 mL; P <.0001), and procedure time (330 ± 100 vs 230 ± 50 minutes; P =.002) was noted. Estimated blood loss was significantly less (P <.0001), and length of stay had a trend (P =.07) toward being lower for all patients in the 3D fusion CT group. Conclusions These results demonstrate that use of intraoperative 3D fusion CT imaging during FEVAR can significantly decrease radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast usage, which may also decrease the overall physiologic impact of the repair.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921486695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921486695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.07.097

DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.07.097

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 309

EP - 316

JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0741-5214

IS - 2

ER -