Validity of plain films in intussusception

J. Alberto Hernandez, Leonard E. Swischuk, Carlos Angel

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to re-evaluate the specificity of plain film findings in intussusception. The plain film findings in 80 cases of proven intussusception were reviewed. Findings documented were: (1) presence or absence of small bowel obstruction, (2) paucity of right lower quadrant gas, (3) presence of an intracolonic mass, (4) presence of a rim or target sign, and (5) presence of the classic triad of intestinal obstruction, intracolonic mass, and paucity of right lower quadrant gas. Intestinal obstruction was present in 54% of patients. In 19 patients (24%) the abdominal films were completely normal. Paucity of right lower quadrant gas was seen in 10% of patients, while specific findings of a mass or a target (rim) sign were seen in 29% of patients. The classic triad of an intracolonic mass, obstruction, and paucity of gas in the right lower quadrant occurred in only 1 patient (1%). Plain films of the abdomen were diagnostic of intussusception in only 29% of cases. A completely normal gas pattern was seen in one-quarter of our patients. This being the case, most patients with suspected intussusception will require further imaging, either by ultrasound or contrast enema. In our institution we favor the ultrasound study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-326
Number of pages4
JournalEmergency Radiology
Volume10
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jul 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Intussusception
Motion Pictures
Gases
Intestinal Obstruction
Enema
Abdomen
Ultrasonography

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Hernandez, J. A., Swischuk, L. E., & Angel, C. (2004). Validity of plain films in intussusception. Emergency Radiology, 10(6), 323-326.

Validity of plain films in intussusception. / Hernandez, J. Alberto; Swischuk, Leonard E.; Angel, Carlos.

In: Emergency Radiology, Vol. 10, No. 6, 01.07.2004, p. 323-326.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Hernandez, JA, Swischuk, LE & Angel, C 2004, 'Validity of plain films in intussusception', Emergency Radiology, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 323-326.
Hernandez JA, Swischuk LE, Angel C. Validity of plain films in intussusception. Emergency Radiology. 2004 Jul 1;10(6):323-326.
Hernandez, J. Alberto ; Swischuk, Leonard E. ; Angel, Carlos. / Validity of plain films in intussusception. In: Emergency Radiology. 2004 ; Vol. 10, No. 6. pp. 323-326.
@article{b52241b30dfc4712b808837b5d1de7a8,
title = "Validity of plain films in intussusception",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to re-evaluate the specificity of plain film findings in intussusception. The plain film findings in 80 cases of proven intussusception were reviewed. Findings documented were: (1) presence or absence of small bowel obstruction, (2) paucity of right lower quadrant gas, (3) presence of an intracolonic mass, (4) presence of a rim or target sign, and (5) presence of the classic triad of intestinal obstruction, intracolonic mass, and paucity of right lower quadrant gas. Intestinal obstruction was present in 54{\%} of patients. In 19 patients (24{\%}) the abdominal films were completely normal. Paucity of right lower quadrant gas was seen in 10{\%} of patients, while specific findings of a mass or a target (rim) sign were seen in 29{\%} of patients. The classic triad of an intracolonic mass, obstruction, and paucity of gas in the right lower quadrant occurred in only 1 patient (1{\%}). Plain films of the abdomen were diagnostic of intussusception in only 29{\%} of cases. A completely normal gas pattern was seen in one-quarter of our patients. This being the case, most patients with suspected intussusception will require further imaging, either by ultrasound or contrast enema. In our institution we favor the ultrasound study.",
author = "Hernandez, {J. Alberto} and Swischuk, {Leonard E.} and Carlos Angel",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "323--326",
journal = "Emergency Radiology",
issn = "1070-3004",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of plain films in intussusception

AU - Hernandez, J. Alberto

AU - Swischuk, Leonard E.

AU - Angel, Carlos

PY - 2004/7/1

Y1 - 2004/7/1

N2 - The aim of this study was to re-evaluate the specificity of plain film findings in intussusception. The plain film findings in 80 cases of proven intussusception were reviewed. Findings documented were: (1) presence or absence of small bowel obstruction, (2) paucity of right lower quadrant gas, (3) presence of an intracolonic mass, (4) presence of a rim or target sign, and (5) presence of the classic triad of intestinal obstruction, intracolonic mass, and paucity of right lower quadrant gas. Intestinal obstruction was present in 54% of patients. In 19 patients (24%) the abdominal films were completely normal. Paucity of right lower quadrant gas was seen in 10% of patients, while specific findings of a mass or a target (rim) sign were seen in 29% of patients. The classic triad of an intracolonic mass, obstruction, and paucity of gas in the right lower quadrant occurred in only 1 patient (1%). Plain films of the abdomen were diagnostic of intussusception in only 29% of cases. A completely normal gas pattern was seen in one-quarter of our patients. This being the case, most patients with suspected intussusception will require further imaging, either by ultrasound or contrast enema. In our institution we favor the ultrasound study.

AB - The aim of this study was to re-evaluate the specificity of plain film findings in intussusception. The plain film findings in 80 cases of proven intussusception were reviewed. Findings documented were: (1) presence or absence of small bowel obstruction, (2) paucity of right lower quadrant gas, (3) presence of an intracolonic mass, (4) presence of a rim or target sign, and (5) presence of the classic triad of intestinal obstruction, intracolonic mass, and paucity of right lower quadrant gas. Intestinal obstruction was present in 54% of patients. In 19 patients (24%) the abdominal films were completely normal. Paucity of right lower quadrant gas was seen in 10% of patients, while specific findings of a mass or a target (rim) sign were seen in 29% of patients. The classic triad of an intracolonic mass, obstruction, and paucity of gas in the right lower quadrant occurred in only 1 patient (1%). Plain films of the abdomen were diagnostic of intussusception in only 29% of cases. A completely normal gas pattern was seen in one-quarter of our patients. This being the case, most patients with suspected intussusception will require further imaging, either by ultrasound or contrast enema. In our institution we favor the ultrasound study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4344683217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4344683217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15278716

AN - SCOPUS:4344683217

VL - 10

SP - 323

EP - 326

JO - Emergency Radiology

JF - Emergency Radiology

SN - 1070-3004

IS - 6

ER -