Video-assisted genetic counseling in patients with ovarian, fallopian and peritoneal carcinoma

Catherine H. Watson, Michael Ulm, Patrick Blackburn, Linda Smiley, Mark Reed, Rachel Covington, Lauren Bokovitz, Todd Tillmanns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives To compare the proportion of patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma who receive genetic testing after observing a genetic counseling video versus after traditional referral for genetic counseling and testing at physician discretion. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients seen at the West Cancer Center for evaluation of ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma from 7/2014 to 8/2015. Patients seen between 7/2014 and 12/2014 were offered standard genetic counseling. We adopted a new standard of care from 3/2015 to 8/2015 involving the use of a genetic counseling video on a digital tablet. The video was shown to patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal cancer, who were then given the option to undergo genetic testing at the end of the viewing. We compared the number and proportion of patients who received genetic testing in both groups. Results The initial group of 267 patients received referral and te\sting at the physician's discretion between 8/2014 and 12/2014. 77/267 (29%) of these patients underwent genetic testing. 295 patients viewed the condensed genetic counseling video with the option to receive testing the same day between 3/2015 and 8/2015. 162/295 (55%) of these patients received testing. The transition from a referral method to the video counseling method resulted in a significant increase of patients tested (p < 0.001). Conclusion Using a genetic counseling video and providing an immediate option for testing significantly increased the proportion of patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma who received genetic testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-112
Number of pages4
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Volume143
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Genetic Counseling
Carcinoma
Genetic Testing
Referral and Consultation
Physicians
Bites and Stings
Standard of Care
Tablets
Counseling
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Video-assisted genetic counseling in patients with ovarian, fallopian and peritoneal carcinoma. / Watson, Catherine H.; Ulm, Michael; Blackburn, Patrick; Smiley, Linda; Reed, Mark; Covington, Rachel; Bokovitz, Lauren; Tillmanns, Todd.

In: Gynecologic Oncology, Vol. 143, No. 1, 01.10.2016, p. 109-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Watson, Catherine H. ; Ulm, Michael ; Blackburn, Patrick ; Smiley, Linda ; Reed, Mark ; Covington, Rachel ; Bokovitz, Lauren ; Tillmanns, Todd. / Video-assisted genetic counseling in patients with ovarian, fallopian and peritoneal carcinoma. In: Gynecologic Oncology. 2016 ; Vol. 143, No. 1. pp. 109-112.
@article{9563515eb40948018a25cb9cb35fbc17,
title = "Video-assisted genetic counseling in patients with ovarian, fallopian and peritoneal carcinoma",
abstract = "Objectives To compare the proportion of patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma who receive genetic testing after observing a genetic counseling video versus after traditional referral for genetic counseling and testing at physician discretion. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients seen at the West Cancer Center for evaluation of ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma from 7/2014 to 8/2015. Patients seen between 7/2014 and 12/2014 were offered standard genetic counseling. We adopted a new standard of care from 3/2015 to 8/2015 involving the use of a genetic counseling video on a digital tablet. The video was shown to patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal cancer, who were then given the option to undergo genetic testing at the end of the viewing. We compared the number and proportion of patients who received genetic testing in both groups. Results The initial group of 267 patients received referral and te\sting at the physician's discretion between 8/2014 and 12/2014. 77/267 (29{\%}) of these patients underwent genetic testing. 295 patients viewed the condensed genetic counseling video with the option to receive testing the same day between 3/2015 and 8/2015. 162/295 (55{\%}) of these patients received testing. The transition from a referral method to the video counseling method resulted in a significant increase of patients tested (p < 0.001). Conclusion Using a genetic counseling video and providing an immediate option for testing significantly increased the proportion of patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma who received genetic testing.",
author = "Watson, {Catherine H.} and Michael Ulm and Patrick Blackburn and Linda Smiley and Mark Reed and Rachel Covington and Lauren Bokovitz and Todd Tillmanns",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.094",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "143",
pages = "109--112",
journal = "Gynecologic Oncology",
issn = "0090-8258",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Video-assisted genetic counseling in patients with ovarian, fallopian and peritoneal carcinoma

AU - Watson, Catherine H.

AU - Ulm, Michael

AU - Blackburn, Patrick

AU - Smiley, Linda

AU - Reed, Mark

AU - Covington, Rachel

AU - Bokovitz, Lauren

AU - Tillmanns, Todd

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Objectives To compare the proportion of patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma who receive genetic testing after observing a genetic counseling video versus after traditional referral for genetic counseling and testing at physician discretion. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients seen at the West Cancer Center for evaluation of ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma from 7/2014 to 8/2015. Patients seen between 7/2014 and 12/2014 were offered standard genetic counseling. We adopted a new standard of care from 3/2015 to 8/2015 involving the use of a genetic counseling video on a digital tablet. The video was shown to patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal cancer, who were then given the option to undergo genetic testing at the end of the viewing. We compared the number and proportion of patients who received genetic testing in both groups. Results The initial group of 267 patients received referral and te\sting at the physician's discretion between 8/2014 and 12/2014. 77/267 (29%) of these patients underwent genetic testing. 295 patients viewed the condensed genetic counseling video with the option to receive testing the same day between 3/2015 and 8/2015. 162/295 (55%) of these patients received testing. The transition from a referral method to the video counseling method resulted in a significant increase of patients tested (p < 0.001). Conclusion Using a genetic counseling video and providing an immediate option for testing significantly increased the proportion of patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma who received genetic testing.

AB - Objectives To compare the proportion of patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma who receive genetic testing after observing a genetic counseling video versus after traditional referral for genetic counseling and testing at physician discretion. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients seen at the West Cancer Center for evaluation of ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma from 7/2014 to 8/2015. Patients seen between 7/2014 and 12/2014 were offered standard genetic counseling. We adopted a new standard of care from 3/2015 to 8/2015 involving the use of a genetic counseling video on a digital tablet. The video was shown to patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal cancer, who were then given the option to undergo genetic testing at the end of the viewing. We compared the number and proportion of patients who received genetic testing in both groups. Results The initial group of 267 patients received referral and te\sting at the physician's discretion between 8/2014 and 12/2014. 77/267 (29%) of these patients underwent genetic testing. 295 patients viewed the condensed genetic counseling video with the option to receive testing the same day between 3/2015 and 8/2015. 162/295 (55%) of these patients received testing. The transition from a referral method to the video counseling method resulted in a significant increase of patients tested (p < 0.001). Conclusion Using a genetic counseling video and providing an immediate option for testing significantly increased the proportion of patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal carcinoma who received genetic testing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990215506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990215506&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.094

DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.094

M3 - Article

VL - 143

SP - 109

EP - 112

JO - Gynecologic Oncology

JF - Gynecologic Oncology

SN - 0090-8258

IS - 1

ER -