Sorción y solubilidad de materiales formulados con resina

Translated title of the contribution: Water-sorption and solubility of materials formulated with resin

M. J. Vaca, L. Ceballos, M. V. Fuentes, R. Osorio, M. Toledano, Franklin Garcia-Godoy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the sorption and solubility of four resin composites: Tetric Ceram (Vivadent), Ecusit (DMG), Degufill (Degussa) and Z-250 (3M-Espe); and two polyacid-modified resins: Luxat (DMG) and lonosit (DMG). Five discs (15 mm × 0.85 mm) of each material were prepared and ground wet to remove poorly polymerized suface layers. Discs were conditioned in a desiccator (37° C) until a constant weight was achieved using an analytic balance (m0); immersed in distilled water 37° C (m1) and finally into a vacuum oven (60° C, 24 h) and reweighted (m2). Sorption (A) and solubility (S) were calculated: A = m1 - m2 / V; S = m0 - m2 / V ANOVA and SNK tests showed statistical differences among the studied materials, ionosit showed the highest sorption and Tetric Ceram and Ecusit the lowest. Luxat presented higher sorption than Degufill, but both materials showed similar sorption values compared with Z-250. The higher solubility was obtained by lonosit. No statistical differences were found among resin composites and Luxat.

Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)283-289
Number of pages7
JournalAvances en Odontoestomatologia
Volume19
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Solubility
Composite Resins
Water
Vacuum
Analysis of Variance
Weights and Measures
Tetric ceram
Ionosit
Vivadent

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Vaca, M. J., Ceballos, L., Fuentes, M. V., Osorio, R., Toledano, M., & Garcia-Godoy, F. (2003). Sorción y solubilidad de materiales formulados con resina. Avances en Odontoestomatologia, 19(6), 283-289.

Sorción y solubilidad de materiales formulados con resina. / Vaca, M. J.; Ceballos, L.; Fuentes, M. V.; Osorio, R.; Toledano, M.; Garcia-Godoy, Franklin.

In: Avances en Odontoestomatologia, Vol. 19, No. 6, 01.12.2003, p. 283-289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vaca, MJ, Ceballos, L, Fuentes, MV, Osorio, R, Toledano, M & Garcia-Godoy, F 2003, 'Sorción y solubilidad de materiales formulados con resina', Avances en Odontoestomatologia, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 283-289.
Vaca MJ, Ceballos L, Fuentes MV, Osorio R, Toledano M, Garcia-Godoy F. Sorción y solubilidad de materiales formulados con resina. Avances en Odontoestomatologia. 2003 Dec 1;19(6):283-289.
Vaca, M. J. ; Ceballos, L. ; Fuentes, M. V. ; Osorio, R. ; Toledano, M. ; Garcia-Godoy, Franklin. / Sorción y solubilidad de materiales formulados con resina. In: Avances en Odontoestomatologia. 2003 ; Vol. 19, No. 6. pp. 283-289.
@article{d5e8355c66334db2acf5f9c14e55e9e2,
title = "Sorci{\'o}n y solubilidad de materiales formulados con resina",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to determine the sorption and solubility of four resin composites: Tetric Ceram (Vivadent), Ecusit (DMG), Degufill (Degussa) and Z-250 (3M-Espe); and two polyacid-modified resins: Luxat (DMG) and lonosit (DMG). Five discs (15 mm × 0.85 mm) of each material were prepared and ground wet to remove poorly polymerized suface layers. Discs were conditioned in a desiccator (37° C) until a constant weight was achieved using an analytic balance (m0); immersed in distilled water 37° C (m1) and finally into a vacuum oven (60° C, 24 h) and reweighted (m2). Sorption (A) and solubility (S) were calculated: A = m1 - m2 / V; S = m0 - m2 / V ANOVA and SNK tests showed statistical differences among the studied materials, ionosit showed the highest sorption and Tetric Ceram and Ecusit the lowest. Luxat presented higher sorption than Degufill, but both materials showed similar sorption values compared with Z-250. The higher solubility was obtained by lonosit. No statistical differences were found among resin composites and Luxat.",
author = "Vaca, {M. J.} and L. Ceballos and Fuentes, {M. V.} and R. Osorio and M. Toledano and Franklin Garcia-Godoy",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "19",
pages = "283--289",
journal = "Avances en Odontoestomatologia",
issn = "0213-1285",
publisher = "Ediciones Avances S.L.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sorción y solubilidad de materiales formulados con resina

AU - Vaca, M. J.

AU - Ceballos, L.

AU - Fuentes, M. V.

AU - Osorio, R.

AU - Toledano, M.

AU - Garcia-Godoy, Franklin

PY - 2003/12/1

Y1 - 2003/12/1

N2 - The aim of this study was to determine the sorption and solubility of four resin composites: Tetric Ceram (Vivadent), Ecusit (DMG), Degufill (Degussa) and Z-250 (3M-Espe); and two polyacid-modified resins: Luxat (DMG) and lonosit (DMG). Five discs (15 mm × 0.85 mm) of each material were prepared and ground wet to remove poorly polymerized suface layers. Discs were conditioned in a desiccator (37° C) until a constant weight was achieved using an analytic balance (m0); immersed in distilled water 37° C (m1) and finally into a vacuum oven (60° C, 24 h) and reweighted (m2). Sorption (A) and solubility (S) were calculated: A = m1 - m2 / V; S = m0 - m2 / V ANOVA and SNK tests showed statistical differences among the studied materials, ionosit showed the highest sorption and Tetric Ceram and Ecusit the lowest. Luxat presented higher sorption than Degufill, but both materials showed similar sorption values compared with Z-250. The higher solubility was obtained by lonosit. No statistical differences were found among resin composites and Luxat.

AB - The aim of this study was to determine the sorption and solubility of four resin composites: Tetric Ceram (Vivadent), Ecusit (DMG), Degufill (Degussa) and Z-250 (3M-Espe); and two polyacid-modified resins: Luxat (DMG) and lonosit (DMG). Five discs (15 mm × 0.85 mm) of each material were prepared and ground wet to remove poorly polymerized suface layers. Discs were conditioned in a desiccator (37° C) until a constant weight was achieved using an analytic balance (m0); immersed in distilled water 37° C (m1) and finally into a vacuum oven (60° C, 24 h) and reweighted (m2). Sorption (A) and solubility (S) were calculated: A = m1 - m2 / V; S = m0 - m2 / V ANOVA and SNK tests showed statistical differences among the studied materials, ionosit showed the highest sorption and Tetric Ceram and Ecusit the lowest. Luxat presented higher sorption than Degufill, but both materials showed similar sorption values compared with Z-250. The higher solubility was obtained by lonosit. No statistical differences were found among resin composites and Luxat.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949748254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949748254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77949748254

VL - 19

SP - 283

EP - 289

JO - Avances en Odontoestomatologia

JF - Avances en Odontoestomatologia

SN - 0213-1285

IS - 6

ER -